Sublimity

Teresa Fenichel
{"title":"Sublimity","authors":"Teresa Fenichel","doi":"10.4324/9781351180153-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this book, I argue for the importance of an ‘early modern sublime’ to the advent of modern English authorship in the late sixteenth and early seventeenth centuries. In making this argument, I yoke together two topics that literary criticism typically keeps separate: ‘The Author’ and ‘The Sublime’. These are titles to two New Critical Idiom volumes, both published by Routledge in : The Author, by Andrew Bennett; and The Sublime, by Philip Shaw. While Shaw never refers to the category of ‘the author’ directly, Bennett mentions ‘the sublime’ twice in passing (, ), opening up a possibility that I suggest is important to English literary history: the connection between authorship and sublimity is vital to the formation of a modern literary canon. Bennett and Shaw write their books for the Routledge series because ‘the author’ and ‘the sublime’ constitute two major terms of modern critical theory. An important body of criticism addresses ‘the author’. Bennett goes so far as to write:","PeriodicalId":236922,"journal":{"name":"Schelling, Freud, and the Philosophical Foundations of Psychoanalysis","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Schelling, Freud, and the Philosophical Foundations of Psychoanalysis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351180153-2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

In this book, I argue for the importance of an ‘early modern sublime’ to the advent of modern English authorship in the late sixteenth and early seventeenth centuries. In making this argument, I yoke together two topics that literary criticism typically keeps separate: ‘The Author’ and ‘The Sublime’. These are titles to two New Critical Idiom volumes, both published by Routledge in : The Author, by Andrew Bennett; and The Sublime, by Philip Shaw. While Shaw never refers to the category of ‘the author’ directly, Bennett mentions ‘the sublime’ twice in passing (, ), opening up a possibility that I suggest is important to English literary history: the connection between authorship and sublimity is vital to the formation of a modern literary canon. Bennett and Shaw write their books for the Routledge series because ‘the author’ and ‘the sublime’ constitute two major terms of modern critical theory. An important body of criticism addresses ‘the author’. Bennett goes so far as to write:
崇高
在这本书中,我论证了“早期现代崇高”对16世纪末和17世纪初现代英国作者身份出现的重要性。在提出这一论点时,我把文学批评通常分开的两个主题结合在一起:“作者”和“崇高”。这是两卷新批评成语的标题,都是由劳特利奇出版社在上出版的:作者,安德鲁·贝内特;以及菲利普·肖的《崇高》。虽然萧伯纳从未直接提到“作者”这一范畴,但班尼特却两次顺便提到“崇高”(,),这开启了一种我认为对英国文学史很重要的可能性:作者身份和崇高之间的联系对现代文学经典的形成至关重要。班尼特和肖为劳特利奇系列写书,因为“作者”和“崇高”构成了现代批评理论的两个主要术语。批评的一个重要主体是针对“作者”的。班尼特甚至写道:
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信