A Comparison of Two Microslip Contact Models for Studying the Mechanics of Underplatform Dampers

Chao Xu, Dongwu Li, M. Gola, C. Gastaldi
{"title":"A Comparison of Two Microslip Contact Models for Studying the Mechanics of Underplatform Dampers","authors":"Chao Xu, Dongwu Li, M. Gola, C. Gastaldi","doi":"10.1115/GT2018-76007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In turbine blade systems, under-platform dampers are widely used to attenuate excessive resonant vibrations. Subjected to vibration excitation, the components with frictionally constrained interfaces can involve very complex contact kinematics induced by tangential and normal relative motions. To effectively calculate the dynamics of a blade-damper system, contact models which can accurately reproduce the interface normal and tangential motions are required. The large majority of works have been developed using macroslip friction models to model the friction damping at the contact interface. However, for those cases with small tangential displacement where high normal loads are applied, macroslip models are not enough to give accurate results. In this paper two recently published microslip models are compared, between them and against the simple macroslip spring-slider model. The aim is to find to which extent these models can accurately predict damper mechanics. One model is the so called GG array, where an array of macroslip elements is used. Each macroslip element of the GG array is assigned its own contact parameters and for each of them four parameters are needed: normal stiffness, tangential stiffness, normal gap and friction coefficient. The other one is a novel continuous microslip friction model. The model is based on a modification of the original classic IWAN model to couple normal and tangential contact loads. Like the GG array the model needs normal and tangential stiffness, and friction coefficient. Unlike the GG array the model is continuous and, instead of the normal gap required by the GG array, the Modified IWAN model needs a preload value. The two models are here applied to the study of the mechanics of a laboratory under-platform damper test rig. The results from the two models are compared and allow their difference, both for damper mechanics and for the complex-spring coefficients, to be assessed.","PeriodicalId":347795,"journal":{"name":"Volume 7C: Structures and Dynamics","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Volume 7C: Structures and Dynamics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/GT2018-76007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

In turbine blade systems, under-platform dampers are widely used to attenuate excessive resonant vibrations. Subjected to vibration excitation, the components with frictionally constrained interfaces can involve very complex contact kinematics induced by tangential and normal relative motions. To effectively calculate the dynamics of a blade-damper system, contact models which can accurately reproduce the interface normal and tangential motions are required. The large majority of works have been developed using macroslip friction models to model the friction damping at the contact interface. However, for those cases with small tangential displacement where high normal loads are applied, macroslip models are not enough to give accurate results. In this paper two recently published microslip models are compared, between them and against the simple macroslip spring-slider model. The aim is to find to which extent these models can accurately predict damper mechanics. One model is the so called GG array, where an array of macroslip elements is used. Each macroslip element of the GG array is assigned its own contact parameters and for each of them four parameters are needed: normal stiffness, tangential stiffness, normal gap and friction coefficient. The other one is a novel continuous microslip friction model. The model is based on a modification of the original classic IWAN model to couple normal and tangential contact loads. Like the GG array the model needs normal and tangential stiffness, and friction coefficient. Unlike the GG array the model is continuous and, instead of the normal gap required by the GG array, the Modified IWAN model needs a preload value. The two models are here applied to the study of the mechanics of a laboratory under-platform damper test rig. The results from the two models are compared and allow their difference, both for damper mechanics and for the complex-spring coefficients, to be assessed.
平台下阻尼器两种微滑移接触模型的比较
在涡轮叶片系统中,平台下阻尼器被广泛用于衰减过度的共振振动。在振动激励下,具有摩擦约束界面的部件可能涉及由切向和法向相对运动引起的非常复杂的接触运动学。为了有效地计算叶片-阻尼器系统的动力学,需要能够准确再现界面法向和切向运动的接触模型。大部分的工作都是利用大滑移摩擦模型来模拟接触界面处的摩擦阻尼。然而,对于那些切向位移较小且施加高法向荷载的情况,大滑移模型不足以给出准确的结果。本文对最近发表的两种微滑动模型进行了比较,并与简单的大滑动弹簧-滑块模型进行了比较。目的是找出这些模型在多大程度上可以准确地预测阻尼器力学。一种模型是所谓的GG数组,其中使用了一组macroslip元素。GG阵列的每个大滑移单元都有自己的接触参数,每个接触参数需要四个参数:法向刚度、切向刚度、法向间隙和摩擦系数。另一个是一种新的连续微滑移摩擦模型。该模型是基于原始经典IWAN模型的修改,以耦合法向和切向接触负载。与GG阵列一样,该模型需要法向和切向刚度以及摩擦系数。与GG阵列不同,该模型是连续的,并且与GG阵列所需的正常间隙不同,修正IWAN模型需要预加载值。本文将这两种模型应用于实验室平台下阻尼器试验台的力学研究。对两种模型的结果进行了比较,并对阻尼器力学和复杂弹簧系数的差异进行了评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信