ON THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE CONCEPTS OF PHENOMENON AND NOUMENON IN MODERN SOCIOLOGY

Z. Toshchenko
{"title":"ON THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE CONCEPTS OF PHENOMENON AND NOUMENON IN MODERN SOCIOLOGY","authors":"Z. Toshchenko","doi":"10.28995/2686-7249-2022-4-392-400","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article analyzes the meanings of the studied processes and phenomena. It is shown that modern sociology is limited mainly to traditional approaches, which are based on the analysis of phenomena – obvious, relatively simply interpreted concepts. It is shown that with all the variety of methodological orientations and methodological techniques, sociological research is mainly aimed at identifying, using and taking into account indicators of the life world, which are expressed through knowledge, opinion, needs, motives, value orientations, interests and other components of public consciousness, as well as such behavioral shares as deeds and actions. A prominent place is occupied by the phenomena of the macro-, meso- and microenvironment. With this approach, these components of the life world appear as phenomena perceived in experience, as objects of sensory contemplation, as a product of empirical knowledge. The conclusion is substantiated that such an approach seriously limits the possibilities of cognition. A transition to the use of the “noumenon” category is required, which makes it possible to reveal the intelligible, latent essence of phenomena and processes, which becomes apparent as a result of study, comprehension and contemplation. In this regard, the essence and content of the noumenon are determined, its ascent from the phenomenon is revealed, as well as its use in the study of social reality – the life world of people, social groups and communities of the modern world.","PeriodicalId":124543,"journal":{"name":"RSUH/RGGU Bulletin. \"Literary Theory. Linguistics. Cultural Studies\" Series","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"RSUH/RGGU Bulletin. \"Literary Theory. Linguistics. Cultural Studies\" Series","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.28995/2686-7249-2022-4-392-400","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article analyzes the meanings of the studied processes and phenomena. It is shown that modern sociology is limited mainly to traditional approaches, which are based on the analysis of phenomena – obvious, relatively simply interpreted concepts. It is shown that with all the variety of methodological orientations and methodological techniques, sociological research is mainly aimed at identifying, using and taking into account indicators of the life world, which are expressed through knowledge, opinion, needs, motives, value orientations, interests and other components of public consciousness, as well as such behavioral shares as deeds and actions. A prominent place is occupied by the phenomena of the macro-, meso- and microenvironment. With this approach, these components of the life world appear as phenomena perceived in experience, as objects of sensory contemplation, as a product of empirical knowledge. The conclusion is substantiated that such an approach seriously limits the possibilities of cognition. A transition to the use of the “noumenon” category is required, which makes it possible to reveal the intelligible, latent essence of phenomena and processes, which becomes apparent as a result of study, comprehension and contemplation. In this regard, the essence and content of the noumenon are determined, its ascent from the phenomenon is revealed, as well as its use in the study of social reality – the life world of people, social groups and communities of the modern world.
论现代社会学现象与本体概念的关系
文章分析了研究过程和现象的意义。它表明,现代社会学主要局限于传统的方法,这些方法是基于对现象的分析-明显的,相对简单的解释概念。研究表明,在各种方法取向和方法技术下,社会学研究的主要目的是识别、使用和考虑生活世界的指标,这些指标通过知识、意见、需求、动机、价值取向、兴趣和公共意识的其他组成部分以及行为份额(如行为和行动)来表达。宏观、中观和微观环境现象占据了突出的位置。通过这种方法,生活世界的这些组成部分表现为经验中感知到的现象,作为感官沉思的对象,作为经验知识的产物。结论证明,这种方法严重限制了认知的可能性。需要过渡到“本体”范畴的使用,这使得揭示现象和过程的可理解的、潜在的本质成为可能,这些本质在研究、理解和沉思的结果中变得明显。在这方面,确定了本体的本质和内容,揭示了本体从现象中上升的过程,以及它在研究社会现实——现代世界的人们、社会群体和社区的生活世界中的应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信