The Conflict between Communal Religious Freedom and Women's Equality: A Proposal for Reform of the Hindu Succession Act of 1956

A. Sridhar
{"title":"The Conflict between Communal Religious Freedom and Women's Equality: A Proposal for Reform of the Hindu Succession Act of 1956","authors":"A. Sridhar","doi":"10.15779/Z382M0J","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Hindu Succession Act of 1956, as part of a movement to codify the system of religious personal laws after India gained its independence in 1947, revolutionized the legal rules governing gender and inheritance. However, as a codification of ancient Hindu law and colonial amendments, the Act retained many limitations on women's rights regarding full ownership of ancestral and other property. Despite the drafters' intent to equalize the property and inheritance rights of Hindu women, a tension persists between the rights granted to women and the limitations preserved within the Act.This article investigates the provisions in the Act that enshrine gender discrimination in one of the most important legal aspects of personal law: inheritance. In particular, this article advocates for changes to the Hindu Succession Act that would equalize the position of men and women in relation to joint families and property rights. [Note: This paper was published prior to the 2005 amendments to the Hindu Succession Act, which removed many of the gender discriminatory provisions.]","PeriodicalId":325917,"journal":{"name":"Berkeley Journal of International Law","volume":"94 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Berkeley Journal of International Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15779/Z382M0J","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The Hindu Succession Act of 1956, as part of a movement to codify the system of religious personal laws after India gained its independence in 1947, revolutionized the legal rules governing gender and inheritance. However, as a codification of ancient Hindu law and colonial amendments, the Act retained many limitations on women's rights regarding full ownership of ancestral and other property. Despite the drafters' intent to equalize the property and inheritance rights of Hindu women, a tension persists between the rights granted to women and the limitations preserved within the Act.This article investigates the provisions in the Act that enshrine gender discrimination in one of the most important legal aspects of personal law: inheritance. In particular, this article advocates for changes to the Hindu Succession Act that would equalize the position of men and women in relation to joint families and property rights. [Note: This paper was published prior to the 2005 amendments to the Hindu Succession Act, which removed many of the gender discriminatory provisions.]
社区宗教自由与妇女平等的冲突:1956年印度继承法的改革建议
1956年的《印度教继承法》(Hindu Succession Act)是1947年印度获得独立后将宗教属人法体系编纂成法律的运动的一部分,它彻底改变了有关性别和继承的法律规则。但是,作为古印度法和殖民修正案的编纂,该法保留了对妇女在祖传财产和其他财产的完全所有权方面的权利的许多限制。尽管起草者的意图是平等印度教妇女的财产和继承权,但赋予妇女的权利与该法所保留的限制之间仍然存在紧张关系。本文调查了该法案中将性别歧视纳入属人法最重要的法律方面之一:继承的条款。本文特别主张修改《印度教继承法》,使男女在共同家庭和财产权方面的地位平等。[注:本文发表于2005年《印度教继承法》修正案之前,该修正案删除了许多性别歧视条款。]
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信