The Key Methods to Increase the Success Rate of Endoscopic Repair of Cerebrospinal Fluid Rhinorrhea

M. Ghazizadeh, Golfam Mehrparvar
{"title":"The Key Methods to Increase the Success Rate of Endoscopic Repair of Cerebrospinal Fluid Rhinorrhea","authors":"M. Ghazizadeh, Golfam Mehrparvar","doi":"10.5812/MINSURGERY.85812","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: To evaluate the success rate of endoscopic repair of CSF leak and factors with potential effect on surgical outcome. Methods: A case series study based on review of medical records and follow up of patients admitted at three hospitals during a 5 year period. Results: Of 43 operated patients 38 (88.4%) had successful result after first surgical attempt. Defect size, number of graft layers, graft placement technique-underlay vs. overlay-lumbar drain placement or serial lumbar punctures did not show a statistically significant association with surgical outcome. Definite determination of defect site before or during operation had a relationship with surgical success with a P value of 0.06 there was a significant correlation between the number of layers on the defect site and immediate postoperative improvement. Conclusions: Endoscopic repair of CSF leak has been proven as a successful method with reported success rate of above 80 percent. Careful attempt to find the exact site of CSF leak is recommended. We do not suggest the routine use of lumbar drains, serial post op lumbar punctures and intrathecal fluorescine due to their potential complications and no evidence for their efficacy.","PeriodicalId":158928,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Minimally Invasive Surgical Sciences","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Minimally Invasive Surgical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5812/MINSURGERY.85812","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate the success rate of endoscopic repair of CSF leak and factors with potential effect on surgical outcome. Methods: A case series study based on review of medical records and follow up of patients admitted at three hospitals during a 5 year period. Results: Of 43 operated patients 38 (88.4%) had successful result after first surgical attempt. Defect size, number of graft layers, graft placement technique-underlay vs. overlay-lumbar drain placement or serial lumbar punctures did not show a statistically significant association with surgical outcome. Definite determination of defect site before or during operation had a relationship with surgical success with a P value of 0.06 there was a significant correlation between the number of layers on the defect site and immediate postoperative improvement. Conclusions: Endoscopic repair of CSF leak has been proven as a successful method with reported success rate of above 80 percent. Careful attempt to find the exact site of CSF leak is recommended. We do not suggest the routine use of lumbar drains, serial post op lumbar punctures and intrathecal fluorescine due to their potential complications and no evidence for their efficacy.
提高内镜下脑脊液鼻漏修补成功率的关键方法
目的:评价内镜下脑脊液漏修补术的成功率及可能影响手术效果的因素。方法:对3家医院住院患者进行5年的病历回顾和随访,采用病例系列研究。结果:43例患者首次手术成功38例(88.4%)。缺损大小、移植物层数、移植物放置技术—衬底、衬底—腰椎引流管放置或连续腰椎穿刺与手术结果没有统计学上显著的关联。术前或术中明确确定缺损部位与手术成功相关,P值为0.06,缺损部位的层数与术后立即改善有显著相关性。结论:内镜下修复脑脊液泄漏是一种成功的方法,成功率在80%以上。建议仔细寻找脑脊液泄漏的确切位置。我们不建议常规使用腰椎引流、连续腰后穿刺和鞘内荧光,因为它们有潜在的并发症,而且没有证据表明它们的疗效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信