A Review on the Use of Chemicals as Steam Additives for Thermal Oil Recovery Applications

Xuan Du, Changfeng Xi, Lanxiang Shi, Bojun Wang, Zongyao Qi, Tong Liu, You Zhou, Jungin Lee, T. Babadagli, H. Li
{"title":"A Review on the Use of Chemicals as Steam Additives for Thermal Oil Recovery Applications","authors":"Xuan Du, Changfeng Xi, Lanxiang Shi, Bojun Wang, Zongyao Qi, Tong Liu, You Zhou, Jungin Lee, T. Babadagli, H. Li","doi":"10.1115/omae2021-62543","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This study conducts a literature survey on the chemical steam additives tested in both lab and field settings from 1982 to present (2020). We summarize the major recovery mechanisms of both steam-based recovery process and steam-chemical-based recovery process. Next, we review the previous lab-scale/field-scale studies examining the applications of surfactants, alkali, and novel chemicals in the steam-based oil recovery process. Among the different surfactants studied, alpha-olefin sulfonate (AOS) and linear toluene sulfonate (LTS) are the recommended chemicals for their foam control/detergency effect. In particular, AOS was observed to perform especially well in residual oil saturation (ROS) reduction and sweep efficiency improvement when being co-injected with alkali. Application of organic alkali (alone or with a co-surfactant) has also drawn wide attention recently, but its efficacy in the field requires further investigation and the consumption of alkali by sands/clay is often an inevitable issue and, therefore, how to control the alkali loss requires further investigation. Novel chemical additives tested in the past five years include fatty acids (such as tail oil acid, TOA-Na+), Biodiesel (o/w emulsion), along with other types of chemical additives including switchable hydrophilicity tertiary amines (SHTA), chelating agents, Deep Eutectic Solvents (DES), graphite and SiO2 particles, ionic liquids and urea. High thermal stability of some of the novel chemicals and their potential in increasing displacement efficiency and ROS reduction efficiency in the lab studies require further investigation for their optimized application in the field settings to minimize the use of steam while improving the recovery effectively. This review reveals that when being properly applied, chemical additives can improve oil recovery via steam foam control, detergency effect (IFT reduction and wettability control), and viscosity reduction. In certain cases, microemulsion generation could be observed (o/w or w/o) with the addition of chemical additives at steam condition (which leads to recovery improvement), but the microemulsion effect on the conformance control (separate from the foamy effect), is lacking detailed investigation.","PeriodicalId":363084,"journal":{"name":"Volume 10: Petroleum Technology","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Volume 10: Petroleum Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/omae2021-62543","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This study conducts a literature survey on the chemical steam additives tested in both lab and field settings from 1982 to present (2020). We summarize the major recovery mechanisms of both steam-based recovery process and steam-chemical-based recovery process. Next, we review the previous lab-scale/field-scale studies examining the applications of surfactants, alkali, and novel chemicals in the steam-based oil recovery process. Among the different surfactants studied, alpha-olefin sulfonate (AOS) and linear toluene sulfonate (LTS) are the recommended chemicals for their foam control/detergency effect. In particular, AOS was observed to perform especially well in residual oil saturation (ROS) reduction and sweep efficiency improvement when being co-injected with alkali. Application of organic alkali (alone or with a co-surfactant) has also drawn wide attention recently, but its efficacy in the field requires further investigation and the consumption of alkali by sands/clay is often an inevitable issue and, therefore, how to control the alkali loss requires further investigation. Novel chemical additives tested in the past five years include fatty acids (such as tail oil acid, TOA-Na+), Biodiesel (o/w emulsion), along with other types of chemical additives including switchable hydrophilicity tertiary amines (SHTA), chelating agents, Deep Eutectic Solvents (DES), graphite and SiO2 particles, ionic liquids and urea. High thermal stability of some of the novel chemicals and their potential in increasing displacement efficiency and ROS reduction efficiency in the lab studies require further investigation for their optimized application in the field settings to minimize the use of steam while improving the recovery effectively. This review reveals that when being properly applied, chemical additives can improve oil recovery via steam foam control, detergency effect (IFT reduction and wettability control), and viscosity reduction. In certain cases, microemulsion generation could be observed (o/w or w/o) with the addition of chemical additives at steam condition (which leads to recovery improvement), but the microemulsion effect on the conformance control (separate from the foamy effect), is lacking detailed investigation.
化学剂作为蒸汽添加剂在热采油中的应用综述
本研究对1982年至今(2020年)在实验室和现场测试的化学蒸汽添加剂进行了文献调查。总结了蒸汽法和蒸汽化学法的主要回收机理。接下来,我们回顾了之前的实验室规模/现场规模的研究,研究了表面活性剂、碱和新型化学品在蒸汽基采油过程中的应用。在所研究的不同表面活性剂中,α -烯烃磺酸盐(AOS)和线性甲苯磺酸盐(LTS)因其泡沫控制/清洁效果而被推荐使用。特别是,AOS与碱共注入时,在降低残余油饱和度(ROS)和提高波及效率方面表现得特别好。近年来,有机碱(单独或与辅助表面活性剂)的应用也引起了广泛的关注,但其在现场的应用效果有待进一步研究,而砂/粘土对碱的消耗往往是一个不可避免的问题,因此如何控制碱损失需要进一步研究。过去五年测试的新型化学添加剂包括脂肪酸(如尾油酸、TOA-Na+)、生物柴油(o/w乳液),以及其他类型的化学添加剂,包括可切换亲水性叔胺(SHTA)、螯合剂、深共晶溶剂(DES)、石墨和SiO2颗粒、离子液体和尿素。一些新型化学物质具有高热稳定性,在实验室研究中具有提高驱油效率和活性氧还原效率的潜力,需要进一步研究它们在现场环境中的优化应用,以最大限度地减少蒸汽的使用,同时有效提高采收率。研究表明,如果使用得当,化学添加剂可以通过控制蒸汽泡沫、清洁效果(降低IFT和润湿性)和降低粘度来提高采收率。在某些情况下,在蒸汽条件下,添加化学添加剂可以观察到微乳液的生成(0 /w或w/o)(导致采收率提高),但微乳液对一致性控制的影响(与泡沫效应分开)缺乏详细的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信