An empirically-based criterion for determining the success of an open-source project

D. Feitelson, G. Heller, S. Schach
{"title":"An empirically-based criterion for determining the success of an open-source project","authors":"D. Feitelson, G. Heller, S. Schach","doi":"10.1109/ASWEC.2006.12","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In order to determine a success criterion for open-source software projects, we analyzed 122,205 projects in the SourceForge database. There were 80,597 projects with no downloads at all. We restricted our analysis to the 41,608 projects that together were downloaded 704,897,520 times. Contrary to what we had expected, the distribution of the number of downloads of each project is not Zipf-like; only a portion of the log-log plot of the number of downloads and their rank appears to be a straight line. We performed least-squares analysis (utilizing the Bayesian information criterion) to divide the plot into three segments. On the basis of the shapes of the corresponding curves and the locations of their boundary points, we categorized the projects as follows: 85 superprojects (highly successful projects with more than 1.1 million downloads); just over 10,000 successful projects (with more than 1680 downloads each); and struggling projects (with 1680 downloads or fewer). In terms of our criterion, only a quarter of the projects that have one or more downloads can be deemed to be successful.","PeriodicalId":285684,"journal":{"name":"Australian Software Engineering Conference (ASWEC'06)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"20","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Software Engineering Conference (ASWEC'06)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ASWEC.2006.12","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 20

Abstract

In order to determine a success criterion for open-source software projects, we analyzed 122,205 projects in the SourceForge database. There were 80,597 projects with no downloads at all. We restricted our analysis to the 41,608 projects that together were downloaded 704,897,520 times. Contrary to what we had expected, the distribution of the number of downloads of each project is not Zipf-like; only a portion of the log-log plot of the number of downloads and their rank appears to be a straight line. We performed least-squares analysis (utilizing the Bayesian information criterion) to divide the plot into three segments. On the basis of the shapes of the corresponding curves and the locations of their boundary points, we categorized the projects as follows: 85 superprojects (highly successful projects with more than 1.1 million downloads); just over 10,000 successful projects (with more than 1680 downloads each); and struggling projects (with 1680 downloads or fewer). In terms of our criterion, only a quarter of the projects that have one or more downloads can be deemed to be successful.
一个基于经验的标准,用于确定一个开源项目的成功
为了确定开源软件项目的成功标准,我们分析了SourceForge数据库中的122205个项目。有80597个项目完全没有下载量。我们将分析限制在41,608个项目上,这些项目总共被下载了704,897,520次。与我们的预期相反,每个项目的下载量分布并不是zipf式的;在下载数量和排名的对数-对数图中,只有一部分看起来是一条直线。我们进行了最小二乘分析(利用贝叶斯信息准则),将该图分为三个部分。根据相应曲线的形状及其边界点的位置,我们将项目分类如下:85个超级项目(下载量超过110万次的非常成功的项目);超过1万个成功项目(每个项目下载量超过1680次);还有挣扎中的项目(下载量不超过1680次)。根据我们的标准,只有1 / 4拥有1次或多次下载量的项目能够称得上成功。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信