A comparative study of the FLC, INC and P&O methods of the MPPT algorithm for a PV system

Houssem Saber, Abd Elouadoud Bendaouad, L. Rahmani, H. Radjeai
{"title":"A comparative study of the FLC, INC and P&O methods of the MPPT algorithm for a PV system","authors":"Houssem Saber, Abd Elouadoud Bendaouad, L. Rahmani, H. Radjeai","doi":"10.1109/SSD54932.2022.9955905","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A photovoltaic generator's output power depends on a variety of parameters including solar radiation intensity and cell temperature. Thus, Maximum Power Point Tracking Controllers (MPPT) should be applied to achieve the maximum PV system power, irrespective of environment variations. The performance of these approaches differs in terms of energy recovery, conversion efficiency, response time and reliability, under various environmental conditions. This paper explores a comparative analysis between different MPPT, that are perturb-and-observe (P&O), incremental conductance (INC), and fuzzy logic controller (FLC). Using MATLAB / Simulink environment, a model of the PV module and the DC / DC boost converter was simulated using the various MPPT techniques. The simulation results demonstrated the advantage of the fuzzy controller at the operating point in terms of settling time, power loss, and oscillations compared with other techniques.","PeriodicalId":253898,"journal":{"name":"2022 19th International Multi-Conference on Systems, Signals & Devices (SSD)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 19th International Multi-Conference on Systems, Signals & Devices (SSD)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SSD54932.2022.9955905","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

A photovoltaic generator's output power depends on a variety of parameters including solar radiation intensity and cell temperature. Thus, Maximum Power Point Tracking Controllers (MPPT) should be applied to achieve the maximum PV system power, irrespective of environment variations. The performance of these approaches differs in terms of energy recovery, conversion efficiency, response time and reliability, under various environmental conditions. This paper explores a comparative analysis between different MPPT, that are perturb-and-observe (P&O), incremental conductance (INC), and fuzzy logic controller (FLC). Using MATLAB / Simulink environment, a model of the PV module and the DC / DC boost converter was simulated using the various MPPT techniques. The simulation results demonstrated the advantage of the fuzzy controller at the operating point in terms of settling time, power loss, and oscillations compared with other techniques.
光伏系统MPPT算法中FLC、INC和P&O方法的比较研究
光伏发电机的输出功率取决于各种参数,包括太阳辐射强度和电池温度。因此,无论环境如何变化,都应该应用最大功率点跟踪控制器(MPPT)来实现光伏系统的最大功率。在不同的环境条件下,这些方法在能量回收、转换效率、响应时间和可靠性方面表现不同。本文对扰动观察(P&O)、增量电导(INC)和模糊逻辑控制器(FLC)三种不同的MPPT进行了比较分析。在MATLAB / Simulink环境下,利用各种MPPT技术对光伏模块和DC / DC升压变换器的模型进行了仿真。仿真结果表明,与其他控制方法相比,模糊控制器在工作点的稳定时间、功耗和振荡等方面具有优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信