Floor Action

Neilan S. Chaturvedi
{"title":"Floor Action","authors":"Neilan S. Chaturvedi","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780197599723.003.0003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Chapter 3 focuses on the legislative early game. Given the individualistic and “Wild West” nature of floor activity in the Senate, we should expect to see senators who want to make an impact propose amendments. Through an in-depth examination of the debate around Congressional Quarterly’s designated key votes from 2003 to 2013, as well as an examination of the 2009 floor debate around the Affordable Care Act and 2003’s Medicare Modernization Act, this chapter illustrates that partisans and leaders were prolific in the amendment activity, while moderates neglected the activity. Still, the argument could be made that moderates win the early game behind the scenes, so the chapter then turns to floor activity on speeches—the logic here is that if moderates are happy with the legislation, they should take to the floor to defend it. Again, we see that moderates eschew this behavior as well.","PeriodicalId":330273,"journal":{"name":"Life in the Middle","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Life in the Middle","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197599723.003.0003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Chapter 3 focuses on the legislative early game. Given the individualistic and “Wild West” nature of floor activity in the Senate, we should expect to see senators who want to make an impact propose amendments. Through an in-depth examination of the debate around Congressional Quarterly’s designated key votes from 2003 to 2013, as well as an examination of the 2009 floor debate around the Affordable Care Act and 2003’s Medicare Modernization Act, this chapter illustrates that partisans and leaders were prolific in the amendment activity, while moderates neglected the activity. Still, the argument could be made that moderates win the early game behind the scenes, so the chapter then turns to floor activity on speeches—the logic here is that if moderates are happy with the legislation, they should take to the floor to defend it. Again, we see that moderates eschew this behavior as well.
地板上的行动
第三章是立法前期博弈。鉴于参议院议会活动的个人主义和“狂野西部”性质,我们应该期待看到想要产生影响的参议员提出修正案。通过对2003年至2013年围绕《国会季刊》指定关键投票的辩论的深入研究,以及对2009年围绕《平价医疗法案》和2003年《医疗保险现代化法案》的辩论的研究,本章说明了党派和领导人在修正案活动中是丰富的,而温和派则忽略了这些活动。尽管如此,还是有人认为,温和派在幕后赢得了早期的胜利,所以这一章就转向了议员们的演讲活动——这里的逻辑是,如果温和派对立法感到满意,他们就应该在议员们面前为它辩护。再一次,我们看到温和派也避免这种行为。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信