Labor Market Effects of Trade Induced Technological Change Under Intellectual Property Rights Protection

Benedikt Zoller-Rydzek
{"title":"Labor Market Effects of Trade Induced Technological Change Under Intellectual Property Rights Protection","authors":"Benedikt Zoller-Rydzek","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3914868","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper I examine the impact of trade liberalization on labor market outcomes using a model with high- and low-skilled workers and intellectual property rights (IPR) protection. I argue that IPR protection is crucial to determine labor market effects of trade liberalization in skill-abundant countries. With IPR protection R&D firms fully internalize the greater market size for their innovation. This leads to low-skill-biased technological change countervailing the negative labor market effects of relative price changes in a Heckscher-Ohlin trade model (Stolper-Samuleson theorem). To solve the general equilibrium model I calibrate it to match the US labor market between 2008 and 2014. I demonstrate that IPR protection cushions the negative price effects of trade liberalization, i.e., the wage gap does not increase as much, all workers face lower unemployment rates and higher wages. Without IPR protection the wages for low skilled workers would decline and their unemployment rate increases after trade liberalization. Moreover, I use CPS (current population survey) data to empirically confirm the model predictions.","PeriodicalId":218824,"journal":{"name":"ERPN: IP (Other) (Sub-Topic)","volume":"53 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERPN: IP (Other) (Sub-Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3914868","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this paper I examine the impact of trade liberalization on labor market outcomes using a model with high- and low-skilled workers and intellectual property rights (IPR) protection. I argue that IPR protection is crucial to determine labor market effects of trade liberalization in skill-abundant countries. With IPR protection R&D firms fully internalize the greater market size for their innovation. This leads to low-skill-biased technological change countervailing the negative labor market effects of relative price changes in a Heckscher-Ohlin trade model (Stolper-Samuleson theorem). To solve the general equilibrium model I calibrate it to match the US labor market between 2008 and 2014. I demonstrate that IPR protection cushions the negative price effects of trade liberalization, i.e., the wage gap does not increase as much, all workers face lower unemployment rates and higher wages. Without IPR protection the wages for low skilled workers would decline and their unemployment rate increases after trade liberalization. Moreover, I use CPS (current population survey) data to empirically confirm the model predictions.
知识产权保护下贸易技术变革的劳动力市场效应
在本文中,我使用一个包含高技能工人和低技能工人以及知识产权保护的模型,考察了贸易自由化对劳动力市场结果的影响。我认为,知识产权保护对于决定技能丰富的国家贸易自由化对劳动力市场的影响至关重要。在知识产权保护下,研发企业充分利用了更大的创新市场规模。这导致低技能偏向的技术变革抵消了Heckscher-Ohlin贸易模型(Stolper-Samuleson定理)中相对价格变化对劳动力市场的负面影响。为了求解一般均衡模型,我将其校准为与2008年至2014年的美国劳动力市场相匹配。我证明了知识产权保护缓冲了贸易自由化的负面价格效应,即工资差距没有增加那么多,所有工人都面临更低的失业率和更高的工资。如果没有知识产权保护,低技能工人的工资将在贸易自由化后下降,失业率将上升。此外,我使用CPS(当前人口调查)数据来实证地证实模型的预测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书