The implementation of public health and economic measures during the first wave of COVID-19 by different countries with respect to time, infection rate and death rate

M. S. Uddin, Tasadduq Imam, M. Moni
{"title":"The implementation of public health and economic measures during the first wave of COVID-19 by different countries with respect to time, infection rate and death rate","authors":"M. S. Uddin, Tasadduq Imam, M. Moni","doi":"10.1145/3437378.3437384","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Since its first confirmed case in December 2019, the COVID-19 outbreak has continued to spread across countries at an alarming rate and resulted in governments worldwide implementing various public health and economic measures to contain the spread This research studies the context of 227 countries concerning their implementation of ten public health and seven economic measures during the first wave of COVID-19 and reflects on the discrepancy in adopting these measures with respect to time, infection rate, death rate, and test rate The results reveal that public health measures have been adopted more often and earlier than economic measures The implementation of measures was mostly influenced by the infection rate The analysis also finds considerable variances in adopting the measures across countries Potentially such variances explain the large difference in COVID-19 related causalities across nations worldwide This is further reflected in this article by considering the top ten countries that experienced a higher death toll The article also explores Australia s notable success in controlling the spread and fatalities of COVID-19 during the first wave, and how it fared against the world regarding its implementation of various measures Overall, this research highlights the high uncertainties governments encounter when facing a new pandemic and the need for global cooperation during such uncertainties © 2021 ACM","PeriodicalId":146881,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 2021 Australasian Computer Science Week Multiconference","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 2021 Australasian Computer Science Week Multiconference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3437378.3437384","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Since its first confirmed case in December 2019, the COVID-19 outbreak has continued to spread across countries at an alarming rate and resulted in governments worldwide implementing various public health and economic measures to contain the spread This research studies the context of 227 countries concerning their implementation of ten public health and seven economic measures during the first wave of COVID-19 and reflects on the discrepancy in adopting these measures with respect to time, infection rate, death rate, and test rate The results reveal that public health measures have been adopted more often and earlier than economic measures The implementation of measures was mostly influenced by the infection rate The analysis also finds considerable variances in adopting the measures across countries Potentially such variances explain the large difference in COVID-19 related causalities across nations worldwide This is further reflected in this article by considering the top ten countries that experienced a higher death toll The article also explores Australia s notable success in controlling the spread and fatalities of COVID-19 during the first wave, and how it fared against the world regarding its implementation of various measures Overall, this research highlights the high uncertainties governments encounter when facing a new pandemic and the need for global cooperation during such uncertainties © 2021 ACM
第一波疫情期间各国在时间、感染率和死亡率方面采取的公共卫生和经济措施
自2019年12月出现首例确诊病例以来,COVID-19疫情继续以惊人的速度在各国蔓延,导致世界各国政府采取了各种公共卫生和经济措施来遏制疫情蔓延。本研究研究了227个国家在第一波COVID-19期间实施10项公共卫生和7项经济措施的背景,并反思了这些措施在采取方面的时间差。感染率死亡率结果表明,采取公共卫生措施的频率和时间比采取经济措施的时间更早,措施的实施主要受到感染率的影响,分析还发现各国在采取措施方面存在相当大的差异,这些差异可能解释了全球各国与COVID-19相关的死亡人数的巨大差异,这在本文中进一步反映了考虑到前10个国家经历了a文章还探讨了澳大利亚在控制第一波COVID-19的传播和死亡人数方面取得的显著成功,以及它在实施各种措施方面与世界各国的表现。总体而言,本研究强调了政府在面临新的大流行时遇到的高度不确定性以及在这种不确定性期间全球合作的必要性©2021 ACM
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书