A triagem auditiva neonatal antecipa o diagnóstico e a intervenção em crianças com perda auditiva

G. Rodrigues, Camila Miranda Loiola-Barreiro, Tânia Pereira, Mariza Cavenaghi Argentino Pomilio
{"title":"A triagem auditiva neonatal antecipa o diagnóstico e a intervenção em crianças com perda auditiva","authors":"G. Rodrigues, Camila Miranda Loiola-Barreiro, Tânia Pereira, Mariza Cavenaghi Argentino Pomilio","doi":"10.1590/S2317-64312015000200001453","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose To identify the age at diagnosis, intervention and amplification, pre and post Newborn Hearing Screening (NHS) implantation into a hearing health service and to compare with the indicators proposed by Joint Committee on Infant Hearing.Methods Three hundred and thirteen files of children enrolled in the auditory rehabilitation sector were analyzed, verifying if the newborn hearing screening and its results were performed, suspicion and age at the diagnosis, intervention and amplification and if they reach the recommended indicators: 3 months for diagnosis and 6 months for intervention.Results Children identified by the NHS were diagnosed and started the intervention sooner than those who did not perform newborn hearing screening. Considering the institutional demand pre and post NHS implementation, there was a reduction of intervention and amplification ages, post newborn hearing screening implementation. Regardless the NHS outcome (pass/fail), screened children had advantage when compared to the non-screened ones, once, among those screened, the diagnosis, intervention and amplification were anticipated. Less than a half of the children who failed NHS completed the diagnosis and began the intervention in the recommended period.Conclusion NHS anticipates the diagnosis and the intervention in children with hearing loss; however, some factors such as family non-adherence and the diagnosis slowed the process, making it impossible for the recommended indicators to be reached in most of the children.","PeriodicalId":439092,"journal":{"name":"Audiology - Communication Research","volume":"2017 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Audiology - Communication Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/S2317-64312015000200001453","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Purpose To identify the age at diagnosis, intervention and amplification, pre and post Newborn Hearing Screening (NHS) implantation into a hearing health service and to compare with the indicators proposed by Joint Committee on Infant Hearing.Methods Three hundred and thirteen files of children enrolled in the auditory rehabilitation sector were analyzed, verifying if the newborn hearing screening and its results were performed, suspicion and age at the diagnosis, intervention and amplification and if they reach the recommended indicators: 3 months for diagnosis and 6 months for intervention.Results Children identified by the NHS were diagnosed and started the intervention sooner than those who did not perform newborn hearing screening. Considering the institutional demand pre and post NHS implementation, there was a reduction of intervention and amplification ages, post newborn hearing screening implementation. Regardless the NHS outcome (pass/fail), screened children had advantage when compared to the non-screened ones, once, among those screened, the diagnosis, intervention and amplification were anticipated. Less than a half of the children who failed NHS completed the diagnosis and began the intervention in the recommended period.Conclusion NHS anticipates the diagnosis and the intervention in children with hearing loss; however, some factors such as family non-adherence and the diagnosis slowed the process, making it impossible for the recommended indicators to be reached in most of the children.
新生儿听力筛查预测了儿童听力损失的诊断和干预
目的了解新生儿听力筛查(NHS)进入听力健康服务的诊断年龄、干预和放大年龄、实施前后年龄,并与婴儿听力联合委员会提出的指标进行比较。方法对听力康复科入组儿童的133份档案进行分析,验证是否进行了新生儿听力筛查及其结果,诊断、干预和扩增时的怀疑和年龄,是否达到诊断3个月、干预6个月的推荐指标。结果通过NHS识别的儿童比未进行新生儿听力筛查的儿童更早被诊断并开始干预。考虑到NHS实施前后的机构需求,在新生儿听力筛查实施后,减少干预和扩大年龄。无论NHS结果如何(通过/不通过),与未筛查的儿童相比,筛查的儿童具有优势,一旦在筛查的儿童中,诊断,干预和放大是预期的。不到一半的未通过NHS的儿童完成了诊断并在推荐的时间内开始了干预。结论NHS对儿童听力损失的诊断和干预具有前瞻性;然而,一些因素,如家庭不遵守和诊断延缓了这一进程,使得大多数儿童不可能达到建议的指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书