Changing the Regulation for Regulating the Change: Innovation �? Driven Regulatory Developments in Italy: Smart Grids, Smart Metering and E�?Mobility

L. Lo Schiavo, M. Delfanti, E. Fumagalli, V. Olivieri
{"title":"Changing the Regulation for Regulating the Change: Innovation �? Driven Regulatory Developments in Italy: Smart Grids, Smart Metering and E�?Mobility","authors":"L. Lo Schiavo, M. Delfanti, E. Fumagalli, V. Olivieri","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1963734","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"For a long time considered as technologically mature, electric systems are now facing a period of rapid changes. The advent of smart grids, smart meters and electromobility is creating new challenges not only in terms of technological innovation but also in terms of economic and technical regulation. This paper focuses on the latter and, taking Italy as a case study, analyses how energy regulation can change to embrace and to stimulate innovation in power systems and electricity markets.Accordingly, we describe the most relevant and recent regulatory decisions on technical innovation, keeping the focus on the regulatory process. Indeed, the Italian case is interesting for a number of reasons, that go beyond its well-known leadership position in the area of smart metering and the related mandatory introduction of Time of Use pricing for a large share of consumers. Italy is facing a dramatic increase in RES (Renewable Energy Sources) penetration: several regulatory developments were introduced to favour the integration of intermitted generation and the transformation of distribution grids in active networks, capable of accommodating DG (Dispersed Generation) units. The paper details the regulator’s commitment to provide the right economic incentives for distribution network operators to invest in demonstration projects for smart grids (and, in perspective, for a wide roll-out of active grids, on the basis of an output-based incentive scheme). Significant steps forward have also been made to ensure an efficient development of Electrical Vehicle recharging infrastructures.We found that several lessons of experience can be drawn from this case study and we believe them useful for other national regulatory authorities. By looking at the regulatory process, more than at the specific solutions and mechanisms adopted (often related to country-specific factors), the main messages are the following. Power system will be profoundly impacted by technological innovation and regulators should invest in building a robust and up-to-date technical knowledge over which to ground their proposals; Key indicators are necessary to cope with RES integration: this paper presents two of them (Reverse Power-flow Time, RPT, and Psmart) that can be used elsewhere; In an initial phase, regulators can get valuable information from demonstration projects, that are an intermediate step between laboratory tests (and prototypes) and full deployment of innovative solutions; Moving to output-based regulation is the efficient choice for full deployment of innovative solutions; The role of regulation is crucial in ensuring that value for the customers is extracted from innovative investments (such as in smart metering) Innovation creates new challenges: regulators have to identify the new border between regulated companies and the competitive market (for instance in the case of electromobility Integration of the different innovations (smart grids, smart metering, electromobility and storage) is probably the hardest challenge for regulators in the next future.To make this case study more easy to read, all technical details are given separately in six different Annexes, each devoted to a specific topic more briefly mentioned in the main body of the paper.","PeriodicalId":103805,"journal":{"name":"Innovation & Organizational Behavior eJournal","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-11-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"22","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Innovation & Organizational Behavior eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1963734","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 22

Abstract

For a long time considered as technologically mature, electric systems are now facing a period of rapid changes. The advent of smart grids, smart meters and electromobility is creating new challenges not only in terms of technological innovation but also in terms of economic and technical regulation. This paper focuses on the latter and, taking Italy as a case study, analyses how energy regulation can change to embrace and to stimulate innovation in power systems and electricity markets.Accordingly, we describe the most relevant and recent regulatory decisions on technical innovation, keeping the focus on the regulatory process. Indeed, the Italian case is interesting for a number of reasons, that go beyond its well-known leadership position in the area of smart metering and the related mandatory introduction of Time of Use pricing for a large share of consumers. Italy is facing a dramatic increase in RES (Renewable Energy Sources) penetration: several regulatory developments were introduced to favour the integration of intermitted generation and the transformation of distribution grids in active networks, capable of accommodating DG (Dispersed Generation) units. The paper details the regulator’s commitment to provide the right economic incentives for distribution network operators to invest in demonstration projects for smart grids (and, in perspective, for a wide roll-out of active grids, on the basis of an output-based incentive scheme). Significant steps forward have also been made to ensure an efficient development of Electrical Vehicle recharging infrastructures.We found that several lessons of experience can be drawn from this case study and we believe them useful for other national regulatory authorities. By looking at the regulatory process, more than at the specific solutions and mechanisms adopted (often related to country-specific factors), the main messages are the following. Power system will be profoundly impacted by technological innovation and regulators should invest in building a robust and up-to-date technical knowledge over which to ground their proposals; Key indicators are necessary to cope with RES integration: this paper presents two of them (Reverse Power-flow Time, RPT, and Psmart) that can be used elsewhere; In an initial phase, regulators can get valuable information from demonstration projects, that are an intermediate step between laboratory tests (and prototypes) and full deployment of innovative solutions; Moving to output-based regulation is the efficient choice for full deployment of innovative solutions; The role of regulation is crucial in ensuring that value for the customers is extracted from innovative investments (such as in smart metering) Innovation creates new challenges: regulators have to identify the new border between regulated companies and the competitive market (for instance in the case of electromobility Integration of the different innovations (smart grids, smart metering, electromobility and storage) is probably the hardest challenge for regulators in the next future.To make this case study more easy to read, all technical details are given separately in six different Annexes, each devoted to a specific topic more briefly mentioned in the main body of the paper.
改变规则以调节变化:创新?驱动意大利监管发展:智能电网、智能电表和E ?流动性
长期以来被认为是技术成熟的电力系统,现在正面临着一个快速变化的时期。智能电网、智能电表和电动汽车的出现不仅在技术创新方面,而且在经济和技术监管方面都带来了新的挑战。本文重点关注后者,并以意大利为例,分析能源监管如何改变,以拥抱和刺激电力系统和电力市场的创新。因此,我们描述了有关技术创新的最相关和最新的监管决定,并将重点放在监管过程上。事实上,意大利的案例很有趣,原因有很多,不仅仅是它在智能电表领域众所周知的领导地位,以及对大部分消费者强制引入使用时间定价。意大利正面临RES(可再生能源)渗透的急剧增加:引入了一些监管发展,以支持间歇性发电的整合和主动网络中配电网的改造,能够容纳DG(分散发电)单元。该文件详细介绍了监管机构的承诺,即为配电网运营商投资智能电网示范项目提供适当的经济激励(并且,从长远来看,在基于输出的激励计划的基础上,广泛推广主动电网)。在确保电动汽车充电基础设施的有效发展方面,也取得了重大进展。我们从这一案例研究中发现了一些经验教训,我们相信它们对其他国家的监管机构是有用的。通过观察监管过程,而不是采用的具体解决办法和机制(通常与具体国家因素有关),主要信息如下。电力系统将受到技术创新的深刻影响,监管机构应投资建立健全和最新的技术知识,以此为基础提出建议;关键指标是应对RES集成所必需的:本文提出了两个可以在其他地方使用的指标(反向潮流时间,RPT和Psmart);在初始阶段,监管机构可以从示范项目中获得有价值的信息,这是实验室测试(和原型)和全面部署创新解决方案之间的中间步骤;转向以产出为基础的监管是全面部署创新解决方案的有效选择;监管的作用对于确保客户从创新投资(如智能电表)中获得价值至关重要。创新带来了新的挑战:监管机构必须确定受监管公司和竞争市场之间的新边界(例如,在电动汽车的情况下,不同创新(智能电网、智能电表、电动汽车和存储)的整合可能是监管机构未来面临的最大挑战。为了使这个案例研究更容易阅读,所有的技术细节分别在六个不同的附件中给出,每个附件都致力于一个特定的主题,在论文的主体中更简要地提到。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信