[Where is the right angle?].

M Filipović, D Demirović, F Arifhodzić
{"title":"[Where is the right angle?].","authors":"M Filipović,&nbsp;D Demirović,&nbsp;F Arifhodzić","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Cephalometric radiographs of 49 cases with normal occlusion in the period of permanent dentition (all cases were orthodontically untreated) to study the angle of mandibular incisors obtained by Tweed's and Kubein-Meesenburg's methods. It is known that in both methods the angle should be 90 degrees in cases with normal occlusion. The results obtained were statistically treated and compared. It was found that majority of cases showed value of the angles to be 90 degrees or very close to it obtained by both methods. This finding indicated that two planes were parallel in majority of cases investigated. A change of the Tweed's angle produced change of the Kubein-Meesenburg's angle in such a way that sum of these two angles was 180 degrees. Inclination of the lower incisors showed a considerable variability which indicated an individual sagittal position of these teeth.</p>","PeriodicalId":77497,"journal":{"name":"Bilten Udruzenja ortodonata Jugoslavije = Bulletin of Orthodontic Society of Yugoslavia","volume":"24 2","pages":"97-100"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1991-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bilten Udruzenja ortodonata Jugoslavije = Bulletin of Orthodontic Society of Yugoslavia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Cephalometric radiographs of 49 cases with normal occlusion in the period of permanent dentition (all cases were orthodontically untreated) to study the angle of mandibular incisors obtained by Tweed's and Kubein-Meesenburg's methods. It is known that in both methods the angle should be 90 degrees in cases with normal occlusion. The results obtained were statistically treated and compared. It was found that majority of cases showed value of the angles to be 90 degrees or very close to it obtained by both methods. This finding indicated that two planes were parallel in majority of cases investigated. A change of the Tweed's angle produced change of the Kubein-Meesenburg's angle in such a way that sum of these two angles was 180 degrees. Inclination of the lower incisors showed a considerable variability which indicated an individual sagittal position of these teeth.

直角在哪里?
对49例正常咬合的恒牙列时期患者(均未进行正畸治疗)的头部x线片,研究Tweed法和Kubein-Meesenburg法获得的下颌切牙角度。众所周知,在正常闭塞的情况下,两种方法的角度都应该是90度。所得结果进行统计学处理和比较。结果表明,两种方法得到的角度值均为90度或非常接近90度。这一发现表明,在调查的大多数情况下,两架飞机是平行的。Tweed角的变化会引起Kubein-Meesenburg角的变化,这样两个角的和就是180度。下门牙的倾斜度显示出相当大的可变性,这表明这些牙齿的单个矢状位置。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书