PROBING POTENTIALS OF DIGITAL AND PHYSICAL MODELLING IN CONSTRUCTION COURSES

M. Hana, Khalid S. Al-Hagla, Ingi A. Elcherif
{"title":"PROBING POTENTIALS OF DIGITAL AND PHYSICAL MODELLING IN CONSTRUCTION COURSES","authors":"M. Hana, Khalid S. Al-Hagla, Ingi A. Elcherif","doi":"10.2495/arc200041","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There are a variety of methods and tools used by educators to teach building construction to architecture students. These methods and tools aim to cover the many and complex skills and knowledge associated with this course. Modelling is a tool that is commonly being used during project-based learning within building construction courses. This research aims to: (1) Examine the potentials of digital and physical modelling as tools for project-based learning; (2) detect the relative ability between the two tools to enhance learning outcomes. The results of this research shall help educators make better decisions when choosing learning tools according to their educational goals. After reviewing the literature related to each tool, a comprehensive list for educational realms and learning outcomes related to building construction courses was developed. Based on this list, a questionnaire and investigative interviews were conducted with two groups, one of them had used digital modelling while the other had used physical modelling within two different projects. It was found that learning outcomes relate not only to the use of the tool itself, but also to the individual/ teamwork setting of the experience, in addition to the size and complexity of the project, and the diversity of its details, materials, and systems. The findings illustrate how these tools and settings can enhance learning outcomes.","PeriodicalId":200057,"journal":{"name":"Eco-Architecture VIII : Harmonisation between Architecture and Nature","volume":"85 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Eco-Architecture VIII : Harmonisation between Architecture and Nature","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2495/arc200041","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

There are a variety of methods and tools used by educators to teach building construction to architecture students. These methods and tools aim to cover the many and complex skills and knowledge associated with this course. Modelling is a tool that is commonly being used during project-based learning within building construction courses. This research aims to: (1) Examine the potentials of digital and physical modelling as tools for project-based learning; (2) detect the relative ability between the two tools to enhance learning outcomes. The results of this research shall help educators make better decisions when choosing learning tools according to their educational goals. After reviewing the literature related to each tool, a comprehensive list for educational realms and learning outcomes related to building construction courses was developed. Based on this list, a questionnaire and investigative interviews were conducted with two groups, one of them had used digital modelling while the other had used physical modelling within two different projects. It was found that learning outcomes relate not only to the use of the tool itself, but also to the individual/ teamwork setting of the experience, in addition to the size and complexity of the project, and the diversity of its details, materials, and systems. The findings illustrate how these tools and settings can enhance learning outcomes.
探索数字和物理建模在建筑课程中的潜力
教育工作者使用各种方法和工具向建筑系学生教授建筑施工。这些方法和工具旨在涵盖与本课程相关的许多复杂技能和知识。建模是一种工具,在建筑施工课程中基于项目的学习中经常使用。本研究旨在:(1)研究数字和物理建模作为基于项目的学习工具的潜力;(2)检测两种工具在提高学习成果方面的相对能力。本研究的结果将有助于教育工作者根据自己的教育目标更好地选择学习工具。在审查了与每种工具相关的文献后,开发了与建筑施工课程相关的教育领域和学习成果的综合列表。根据这份清单,我们对两组进行了问卷调查和调查访谈,其中一组在两个不同的项目中使用了数字建模,而另一组则使用了物理建模。研究发现,学习成果不仅与工具本身的使用有关,还与项目的规模和复杂性以及细节、材料和系统的多样性有关,还与个人/团队的经验设置有关。研究结果说明了这些工具和环境如何能够提高学习成果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信