PENERAPAN PRINSIP FIRST COME FIRST SERVED DALAM PENYELESAIAN TUMPANG TINDIH WILAYAH IZIN USAHA PERTAMBANGAN

A. Redi, Susanto Dharma
{"title":"PENERAPAN PRINSIP FIRST COME FIRST SERVED DALAM PENYELESAIAN TUMPANG TINDIH WILAYAH IZIN USAHA PERTAMBANGAN","authors":"A. Redi, Susanto Dharma","doi":"10.24912/erahukum.v17i2.5992","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Indonesian mining industry have undergone impressive pace of development that dispute concerning overlapping on Mining Business License Area which triggers Mining Business License cancellation or revocation. One of such incidents occur between PT Kemakmuran Pertiwi Tambang and PT Wana Kencana Mineral, whereas both companies obtained Mining Business License for the same commodity on the same Mining Business License Area. How can legal certainty be relied upon concerning the Operation Production Mining Business License for holders of Exploration Mining Business License on the overlapped Mining Business License Area based on Mining Law and does the revocation conducted by the Governor of North Maluku has been in accordance with the applicable regulation? To answer both issues above, the author utilized normative qualitative analysis technique and interviews as supporting data. Based on Law No. 4 Th. 2009 concerning mineral and coal mining Article 46, every holder of Exploration Mining Business License shall reserve the right to obtain Operation Production Mining Business License and by using \"first come first served\" system, PT Kemakmuran Pertiwi Tambang should have the first right to obtain Mining Business License since they have obtained the Exploration Mining Business License in 2005. Meanwhile the revocation conducted by the Governor of North Maluku is clearly against the applicable regulations such as Law No. 30 Th. 2014 concerning Government Administration, Law No. 9 Th. 2015 concerning Regional Regulation, General Principles of Good Governance and Article 119 of Mining Law concerning the terms for Mining Business License revocation.","PeriodicalId":241921,"journal":{"name":"Era Hukum - Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Hukum","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Era Hukum - Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Hukum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24912/erahukum.v17i2.5992","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Indonesian mining industry have undergone impressive pace of development that dispute concerning overlapping on Mining Business License Area which triggers Mining Business License cancellation or revocation. One of such incidents occur between PT Kemakmuran Pertiwi Tambang and PT Wana Kencana Mineral, whereas both companies obtained Mining Business License for the same commodity on the same Mining Business License Area. How can legal certainty be relied upon concerning the Operation Production Mining Business License for holders of Exploration Mining Business License on the overlapped Mining Business License Area based on Mining Law and does the revocation conducted by the Governor of North Maluku has been in accordance with the applicable regulation? To answer both issues above, the author utilized normative qualitative analysis technique and interviews as supporting data. Based on Law No. 4 Th. 2009 concerning mineral and coal mining Article 46, every holder of Exploration Mining Business License shall reserve the right to obtain Operation Production Mining Business License and by using "first come first served" system, PT Kemakmuran Pertiwi Tambang should have the first right to obtain Mining Business License since they have obtained the Exploration Mining Business License in 2005. Meanwhile the revocation conducted by the Governor of North Maluku is clearly against the applicable regulations such as Law No. 30 Th. 2014 concerning Government Administration, Law No. 9 Th. 2015 concerning Regional Regulation, General Principles of Good Governance and Article 119 of Mining Law concerning the terms for Mining Business License revocation.
印度尼西亚采矿业的发展速度令人印象深刻,采矿营业执照区域重叠的争议引发了采矿营业执照的注销或撤销。其中一个事件发生在PT Kemakmuran Pertiwi Tambang和PT Wana Kencana minerals之间,而这两家公司在同一采矿业务许可证区域获得了同一商品的采矿业务许可证。根据《矿业法》,在重叠采矿经营许可证区域的勘探采矿经营许可证持有人的经营生产采矿经营许可证的法律确定性如何依赖,北马鲁古总督的撤销是否符合适用的规定?为了回答上述两个问题,作者使用了规范的定性分析技术和访谈作为支持数据。根据2009年第4号关于矿产和煤炭开采的法律第46条,每个勘探采矿经营许可证的持有人保留获得经营生产采矿经营许可证的权利,并采用“先到先得”制度,PT Kemakmuran Pertiwi Tambang自2005年获得勘探采矿经营许可证以来,应具有优先获得采矿经营许可证的权利。同时,北马鲁古省长的撤销行为明显违反了2014年第30号《政府管理法》、2015年第9号《区域管理法》、《善治总则》和《矿业法》第119条关于撤销采矿营业执照条款的规定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信