Anja Gajić, B. Arsić, Kristina Ivanović, Sara Vidojković, A. Bašić, Dragana Maćešić-Petrović
{"title":"SHADOW TEACHERS OPINIONS ABOUT THEIR JOB RESPONSIBILITIES","authors":"Anja Gajić, B. Arsić, Kristina Ivanović, Sara Vidojković, A. Bašić, Dragana Maćešić-Petrović","doi":"10.51558/2744-1555.2021.4.2.134","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Parents of children with disabilities are eligible to apply for additional services to aid their\nchild in the education process. Parents frequently use the service of shadow teachers, but they\noften end up unsatisfied with the service and change shadow teachers repeatedly. The aim of\nthis research is to a) examine shadow teachers' beliefs about their obligations; b) determine\nwhat are their obligations; c) determine what they believe is their level of proficiency in\ndifferent areas of shadow teaching position and d) determine the discrepancy between what\nshadow teachers believe their job should be and what job obligations they were expected to\ndo while shadowing a child.\nThe instrument used was the survey distributed by Manansala & Dizon (2008), it was\ntranslated into Serbian language and modified. The sample consisted of 36 students of\nFaculty for Special education who currently work or have worked in the past as a shadow\nteacher.\nSince the sample consisted of shadow teachers who are also students of special education, it\nis expected that most of the sample believe that they are very proficient in all job areas. There\nwas a huge discrepancy between what they believe is their job obligation and what their job\nresponsibilities are in all five areas. Future research implications and study limitations were\ndiscussed.\nKey words: shadow teachers, inclusion, school, disability.","PeriodicalId":247394,"journal":{"name":"Research in Education and Rehabilitation","volume":"52 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in Education and Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51558/2744-1555.2021.4.2.134","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Parents of children with disabilities are eligible to apply for additional services to aid their
child in the education process. Parents frequently use the service of shadow teachers, but they
often end up unsatisfied with the service and change shadow teachers repeatedly. The aim of
this research is to a) examine shadow teachers' beliefs about their obligations; b) determine
what are their obligations; c) determine what they believe is their level of proficiency in
different areas of shadow teaching position and d) determine the discrepancy between what
shadow teachers believe their job should be and what job obligations they were expected to
do while shadowing a child.
The instrument used was the survey distributed by Manansala & Dizon (2008), it was
translated into Serbian language and modified. The sample consisted of 36 students of
Faculty for Special education who currently work or have worked in the past as a shadow
teacher.
Since the sample consisted of shadow teachers who are also students of special education, it
is expected that most of the sample believe that they are very proficient in all job areas. There
was a huge discrepancy between what they believe is their job obligation and what their job
responsibilities are in all five areas. Future research implications and study limitations were
discussed.
Key words: shadow teachers, inclusion, school, disability.