The Impact of Using Rubrics as Assessment Tools on Pupils’ Academic Performance in Senior Secondary Mathematics: A case of Malela Secondary School, Copperbelt Province, Zambia.

Fridah Chileshe, H. Jacob
{"title":"The Impact of Using Rubrics as Assessment Tools on Pupils’ Academic Performance in Senior Secondary Mathematics: A case of Malela Secondary School, Copperbelt Province, Zambia.","authors":"Fridah Chileshe, H. Jacob","doi":"10.7176/mtm/9-7-02","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study was conducted to show whether or not using rubrics as an assessment tool has an impact on pupils’ academic performance in Mathematics at senior secondary school level. The problem of poor performance of Grade 12 pupils in Mathematics has been a matter of concern, especially at Malela secondary school.  In this study, a rubric served as an assessment tool to gather information about pupils’ achievement levels in demonstrating both knowledge and skills. The study sample population included two (2) grade 12 classes, were one class was the experimental group (N=55) and the other one was a control group (N=55) and Six (6) teachers of Mathematics. The two (2) grades twelve (12) classes were selected from the target population of the five (5) grade twelve classes using simple random sampling, and the six (6) teachers were selected purporsively.The study was based on three (3) research questions and two hypotheses. The research method used was a mixed approach and the research design was a quasi-experimental design. Three topics were taught to both the experimental and control groups which included probability, geometrical transformations and linear programing using problem based learning strategies. The experimental group was assessed using rubrics while the control group was assessed using conventional forms of assessment. The two groups were subjected to a pre-test, end of topic tests and a post-test. Data was also collected using teacher questionnaires and classroom observations. Quantitative data was analyzed using SPSS version 20, where an independent sample t-test was conducted at alpha (α) = 0.05 significance level and qualitative data was analyzed by categorizing, describing and explaining. The study revealed that using rubrics for assessment was found to have a positive impact on pupils’ academic performance as the experimental group outperformed the control group. The study also revealed that Mathematics teachers had a limited way of assessing pupils in class. Hence the reason to recommend that alternative assessment tools (rubrics) should be made mandatory to teachers of Mathematics at senior secondary school level. Keywords: Rubric, Assessment, Assessment tools, Conventional forms of assessment, academic performance. DOI : 10.7176/MTM/9-7-02 Publication date : July 31 st 2019","PeriodicalId":394772,"journal":{"name":"Mathematical Theory and Modeling","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mathematical Theory and Modeling","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7176/mtm/9-7-02","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study was conducted to show whether or not using rubrics as an assessment tool has an impact on pupils’ academic performance in Mathematics at senior secondary school level. The problem of poor performance of Grade 12 pupils in Mathematics has been a matter of concern, especially at Malela secondary school.  In this study, a rubric served as an assessment tool to gather information about pupils’ achievement levels in demonstrating both knowledge and skills. The study sample population included two (2) grade 12 classes, were one class was the experimental group (N=55) and the other one was a control group (N=55) and Six (6) teachers of Mathematics. The two (2) grades twelve (12) classes were selected from the target population of the five (5) grade twelve classes using simple random sampling, and the six (6) teachers were selected purporsively.The study was based on three (3) research questions and two hypotheses. The research method used was a mixed approach and the research design was a quasi-experimental design. Three topics were taught to both the experimental and control groups which included probability, geometrical transformations and linear programing using problem based learning strategies. The experimental group was assessed using rubrics while the control group was assessed using conventional forms of assessment. The two groups were subjected to a pre-test, end of topic tests and a post-test. Data was also collected using teacher questionnaires and classroom observations. Quantitative data was analyzed using SPSS version 20, where an independent sample t-test was conducted at alpha (α) = 0.05 significance level and qualitative data was analyzed by categorizing, describing and explaining. The study revealed that using rubrics for assessment was found to have a positive impact on pupils’ academic performance as the experimental group outperformed the control group. The study also revealed that Mathematics teachers had a limited way of assessing pupils in class. Hence the reason to recommend that alternative assessment tools (rubrics) should be made mandatory to teachers of Mathematics at senior secondary school level. Keywords: Rubric, Assessment, Assessment tools, Conventional forms of assessment, academic performance. DOI : 10.7176/MTM/9-7-02 Publication date : July 31 st 2019
使用标准作为评估工具对学生高中数学学习成绩的影响:以赞比亚铜带省Malela中学为例
本研究的目的是显示是否使用标尺作为一种评估工具对高中阶段学生的数学学习成绩有影响。12年级学生数学成绩不佳的问题一直是一个令人关注的问题,特别是在Malela中学。在这项研究中,一个标题作为评估工具来收集学生在展示知识和技能方面的成就水平的信息。研究样本人群包括2个12年级班级,其中一个班级为实验组(N=55),另一个班级为对照组(N=55), 6名数学教师。采用简单随机抽样的方法,从5个12年级班级的目标人群中选择2个12年级班级,有目的地选择6名教师。该研究基于三(3)个研究问题和两个假设。研究方法采用混合方法,研究设计为准实验设计。实验组和对照组分别学习了三个主题,包括概率、几何变换和线性规划,使用基于问题的学习策略。实验组采用标准评定法,对照组采用常规评定法。两组分别进行了前测、主题结束测试和后测。数据也通过教师问卷调查和课堂观察收集。定量资料采用SPSS 20进行分析,在alpha (α) = 0.05显著性水平下进行独立样本t检验,定性资料采用分类、描述、解释的方法进行分析。研究显示,使用标尺进行评估对学生的学习成绩有积极影响,实验组的表现优于对照组。研究还显示,数学老师在课堂上评估学生的方式有限。因此,我们有理由建议,替代评估工具(标准)应该强制要求高中数学教师使用。关键词:评语,评估,评估工具,传统评估形式,学习成绩出版日期:2019年7月31日
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信