Subjectivity as a Prerequisite for Qualitative Development of Ukrainian Polygraphology

T. Morozova, O. Morozov
{"title":"Subjectivity as a Prerequisite for Qualitative Development of Ukrainian Polygraphology","authors":"T. Morozova, O. Morozov","doi":"10.51369/2707-7276-2020-(1-3)-11","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The subject of consideration is the analysis of the history of formation and current trends in domestic polygraphology with an emphasis on subjectivity as \na mandatory component of further qualitative development of this area with the provision of state interests, including the interests of state security.\nPolygraph studies have been conducted by domestic specialists on a regular basis since 1998. In 22 years, this method of establishing the truth from the little-known, mythical, and since the 30s of the last century, traditionally unacceptable by our lawyers, has become well-known and generally praised by society. Publications on the positive results of polygraph examinations on high-profile criminal proceedings, official investigations, personnel inspections in law enforcement agencies and special services have contributed to the growing popularity of the method. The use of a polygraph in filming and television broadcasts on a number of Ukrainian channels, checking politicians for integrity, and public polygraph calls to political opponents and business competitors have become traditional.\nAnalysis of attempts to introduce polygraph technologies in different countries shows that after the initial accumulation of knowledge and experience, the formation of a positive attitude of society, then especially important is the direction of regulatory and theoretical and methodological framework for the use of polygraph. Blind copying of someone else’s experience is inevitably accompanied by copying someone else’s mistakes, the harmful dependence of the pace, quality and vector of development of the polygraph of a particular state on outside influence.","PeriodicalId":133220,"journal":{"name":"Information Security of the Person, Society and State","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Information Security of the Person, Society and State","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51369/2707-7276-2020-(1-3)-11","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The subject of consideration is the analysis of the history of formation and current trends in domestic polygraphology with an emphasis on subjectivity as a mandatory component of further qualitative development of this area with the provision of state interests, including the interests of state security. Polygraph studies have been conducted by domestic specialists on a regular basis since 1998. In 22 years, this method of establishing the truth from the little-known, mythical, and since the 30s of the last century, traditionally unacceptable by our lawyers, has become well-known and generally praised by society. Publications on the positive results of polygraph examinations on high-profile criminal proceedings, official investigations, personnel inspections in law enforcement agencies and special services have contributed to the growing popularity of the method. The use of a polygraph in filming and television broadcasts on a number of Ukrainian channels, checking politicians for integrity, and public polygraph calls to political opponents and business competitors have become traditional. Analysis of attempts to introduce polygraph technologies in different countries shows that after the initial accumulation of knowledge and experience, the formation of a positive attitude of society, then especially important is the direction of regulatory and theoretical and methodological framework for the use of polygraph. Blind copying of someone else’s experience is inevitably accompanied by copying someone else’s mistakes, the harmful dependence of the pace, quality and vector of development of the polygraph of a particular state on outside influence.
主体性:乌克兰测谎学质量化发展的前提
考虑的主题是分析国内测谎学的形成历史和当前趋势,强调主观性是该领域进一步质的发展的强制性组成部分,并提供国家利益,包括国家安全利益。自1998年以来,国内专家定期进行测谎仪研究。在22年的时间里,这种从鲜为人知的,神秘的,自上世纪30年代以来,传统上被我们的律师所接受的,建立真相的方法,已经广为人知,并得到了社会的普遍赞誉。关于在引人注目的刑事诉讼、官方调查、执法机构和特别服务人员检查中使用测谎仪的积极结果的出版物,使这种方法日益普及。在乌克兰一些频道的拍摄和电视广播中使用测谎仪,检查政客的诚信,以及公开要求政治对手和商业竞争对手使用测谎仪,已经成为传统。对不同国家尝试引进测谎仪技术的分析表明,在初步积累了知识和经验,形成了积极的社会态度之后,随后特别重要的是对测谎仪使用的监管方向以及理论和方法框架。盲目复制别人的经验不可避免地伴随着复制别人的错误,一个特定国家的测谎仪的发展速度、质量和矢量对外部影响的有害依赖。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信