Optimal Orientations and Locations of Actuators and Sensors for Structural Shape Control, Using Intelligent Algorithms

Jingyu Yang, Guo-ping Chen
{"title":"Optimal Orientations and Locations of Actuators and Sensors for Structural Shape Control, Using Intelligent Algorithms","authors":"Jingyu Yang, Guo-ping Chen","doi":"10.1109/ICMTMA.2013.189","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Optimal design of the orientations and locations of collocated piezoelectric actuators/sensors pairs for a plate-like structure under bending load uncertainty are determined with the objective of minimizing the deflection and electrical input under any sort of loading. The bending moments generated by the piezoelectric actuator actuators are used for deflection control, i.e., to minimize the deflection. The plate-like structure is subjected to an arbitrary load which lies in an uncertainty domain with regard to its magnitude and direction. The uncertain loading studied in the present paper involves a load of unknown magnitude and direction, which should be determined to produce the arbitrary deflection. Two optimization variables are considered for each piezoelectric actuator/sensor device: the location of its center and its orientation. An optimal control algorithm and three types of artificial intelligence algorithms (AISOOL algorithm--Artificial Immune Systems for optimization of orientations and locations of actuators, ACOPSOOOL algorithm--ACO and PSO for optimization of orientations and locations of actuators, HTOOL algorithm--Hop field-Tank for optimization of orientations and locations of actuators, optimal control algorithm) are presented for the determination of the orientation and location of piezoelectric actuators/sensors in the application to shape control of plate-like structures. Numerical results show that simultaneous optimization of both orientations and locations can lead to optimum configurations that consume less electrical energy and minimizing the deflection. AISOOL algorithm can handle the optimization of orientations and locations of actuators/sensors better than ACOPSOOOL algorithm and HTOOL algorithm. The different algorithms exhibit similar performance. However, exhaustive ACOPSOOOL algorithm and HTOOL algorithm require significantly higher computational effort.","PeriodicalId":169447,"journal":{"name":"2013 Fifth International Conference on Measuring Technology and Mechatronics Automation","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2013 Fifth International Conference on Measuring Technology and Mechatronics Automation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICMTMA.2013.189","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Optimal design of the orientations and locations of collocated piezoelectric actuators/sensors pairs for a plate-like structure under bending load uncertainty are determined with the objective of minimizing the deflection and electrical input under any sort of loading. The bending moments generated by the piezoelectric actuator actuators are used for deflection control, i.e., to minimize the deflection. The plate-like structure is subjected to an arbitrary load which lies in an uncertainty domain with regard to its magnitude and direction. The uncertain loading studied in the present paper involves a load of unknown magnitude and direction, which should be determined to produce the arbitrary deflection. Two optimization variables are considered for each piezoelectric actuator/sensor device: the location of its center and its orientation. An optimal control algorithm and three types of artificial intelligence algorithms (AISOOL algorithm--Artificial Immune Systems for optimization of orientations and locations of actuators, ACOPSOOOL algorithm--ACO and PSO for optimization of orientations and locations of actuators, HTOOL algorithm--Hop field-Tank for optimization of orientations and locations of actuators, optimal control algorithm) are presented for the determination of the orientation and location of piezoelectric actuators/sensors in the application to shape control of plate-like structures. Numerical results show that simultaneous optimization of both orientations and locations can lead to optimum configurations that consume less electrical energy and minimizing the deflection. AISOOL algorithm can handle the optimization of orientations and locations of actuators/sensors better than ACOPSOOOL algorithm and HTOOL algorithm. The different algorithms exhibit similar performance. However, exhaustive ACOPSOOOL algorithm and HTOOL algorithm require significantly higher computational effort.
用于结构形状控制的致动器和传感器的最佳方向和位置,使用智能算法
以最小挠度和最小电输入为目标,确定了弯曲载荷不确定条件下板状结构压电致动器/传感器对配置方向和位置的优化设计。压电致动器产生的弯矩用于挠度控制,即使挠度最小化。板状结构受到任意载荷的作用,这种载荷在大小和方向上都处于不确定域。本文研究的不确定荷载涉及未知大小和方向的荷载,这些荷载必须确定才能产生任意挠度。对于每个压电作动器/传感器装置,考虑了两个优化变量:中心位置和方向。一种最优控制算法和三种人工智能算法(AISOOL算法——用于优化执行器的方向和位置的人工免疫系统,ACOPSOOOL算法——用于优化执行器的方向和位置的ACO和PSO, HTOOL算法——用于优化执行器的方向和位置的Hop field-Tank,在类板结构的形状控制中,提出了用于确定压电致动器/传感器的方向和位置的最优控制算法。数值计算结果表明,同时对方向和位置进行优化可以得到消耗较少电能和使挠度最小化的最优构型。与ACOPSOOOL算法和HTOOL算法相比,AISOOL算法可以更好地处理致动器/传感器的方向和位置优化。不同的算法表现出相似的性能。而穷穷ACOPSOOOL算法和HTOOL算法的计算量要大得多。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信