Energy balance in turbulent gas-solid channel flow

Lihao Zhao, Qingqing Pan, H. Andersson
{"title":"Energy balance in turbulent gas-solid channel flow","authors":"Lihao Zhao, Qingqing Pan, H. Andersson","doi":"10.1615/tsfp9.1170","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of the present study is to examine the implications of particle additives on the transfer, conversion and dissipation of mechanical energy in a turbulent gas-solid channel flow. To achieve this goal we have performed two-way coupled direct numerical simulations (DNSs) of gas-solid channel flow. Equations for fluid mean flow kinetic energy (KE) and fluid turbulent kinetic energy (TKE) are used in the results analysis. To highlight the influence of particles, the KE budgets were compared with the results of un-laden channel flow, i.e. without any additives. It was found that in the un-laden flow, 57.2% of the energy input was directly dissipated in the mean flow, whereas 40.2% was converted to turbulence through mean shear production before being dissipated by viscous action at small scales. By contrast, in the particle-laden flow, the interaction of the particles and fluid appears in the energy budgets. In the mean-flow energy balance, the mean dissipation accounted for 59.1% of the energy supply. This is comparable with the un-laden flow. However, the energy loss from the mean flow reduced from 40.2% to 13.7%, but was partly compensated by the new sink term (24.7%) which represents negative work done by the particles. The results also suggested that the mean flow loses kinetic energy to particles in the centre region of the channel, whereas it gains energy from the particles in the near-wall region. In the TKE budget, the particles released kinetic energy to the turbulence and this energy is likely obtained from the mean flow. This extra energy supply compensates partially for the substantial reduction of the mean shear production to about 2/3 of the production in the un-laden channel. Ultimately TKE is dissipated by deformation work due to the fluctuating viscous stresses. We concluded that the particles play an intermediary role in the energy transfer and conversion from the mean flow to the turbulence. INTRODUCTION Particle-laden flow is one of the most common twophase flows, which is found both in nature and industry, such as air transport of pollutants, fluidized bed in chemical processes, and dispersion of volcanic ash in the atmosphere. The complexity of the turbulent fluid motion leads to fascinating dynamics of particle suspensions as well as complicated particle-fluid interactions, such as kinetic energy transfer between the solid and gas phases (see Zhao et al. 2013). It is known that the addition of tiny particles can modulate the fluid motion and either augmentation or attenuation of the turbulence has been observed (Balachandar & Eaton 2010, Squires & Eaton 1990). Such phenomena have been widely explored by means of experiments and numerical simulations, such as Squires & Eaton (1990), Pan & Banerjee (1996), Dritselis and Vlachos (2008), Zhao et al. (2010). Kinetic energy budgets are one of the primary tools to examine the turbulent flow. Andersson & Barri (2008) investigated KE transport and conversion in an unladen turbulent plane Couette flow. Mansour et al. (1988) have shown and analysed the Reynolds stress budgets and the turbulent dissipation in a turbulent channel flow. In flows of gas-solid mixtures the suspended solid particles interact with the fluid and make the energy exchange processes more complex than in an unladen channel flow (Balachandar & Eaton 2010). In the presence of particles, a reaction force from each and every particle affects the fluid motion through an extra force term in the NavierStokes equations. The presence of this particle force may give rise to significant modifications of the flow field, both in isotropic turbulence (Squires & Eaton 1990) and in channel flows (Li et al. 2010). In this work the two-way coupled Eulerian-Lagrangian approach is employed to investigate particle suspensions in turbulent channel flow and we mainly focus on the influence of tiny inertial particles on the KE and TKE balance of the particle-laden flow. June 30 July 3, 2015 Melbourne, Australia 9 6C-4","PeriodicalId":196124,"journal":{"name":"Proceeding of Ninth International Symposium on Turbulence and Shear Flow Phenomena","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceeding of Ninth International Symposium on Turbulence and Shear Flow Phenomena","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1615/tsfp9.1170","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of the present study is to examine the implications of particle additives on the transfer, conversion and dissipation of mechanical energy in a turbulent gas-solid channel flow. To achieve this goal we have performed two-way coupled direct numerical simulations (DNSs) of gas-solid channel flow. Equations for fluid mean flow kinetic energy (KE) and fluid turbulent kinetic energy (TKE) are used in the results analysis. To highlight the influence of particles, the KE budgets were compared with the results of un-laden channel flow, i.e. without any additives. It was found that in the un-laden flow, 57.2% of the energy input was directly dissipated in the mean flow, whereas 40.2% was converted to turbulence through mean shear production before being dissipated by viscous action at small scales. By contrast, in the particle-laden flow, the interaction of the particles and fluid appears in the energy budgets. In the mean-flow energy balance, the mean dissipation accounted for 59.1% of the energy supply. This is comparable with the un-laden flow. However, the energy loss from the mean flow reduced from 40.2% to 13.7%, but was partly compensated by the new sink term (24.7%) which represents negative work done by the particles. The results also suggested that the mean flow loses kinetic energy to particles in the centre region of the channel, whereas it gains energy from the particles in the near-wall region. In the TKE budget, the particles released kinetic energy to the turbulence and this energy is likely obtained from the mean flow. This extra energy supply compensates partially for the substantial reduction of the mean shear production to about 2/3 of the production in the un-laden channel. Ultimately TKE is dissipated by deformation work due to the fluctuating viscous stresses. We concluded that the particles play an intermediary role in the energy transfer and conversion from the mean flow to the turbulence. INTRODUCTION Particle-laden flow is one of the most common twophase flows, which is found both in nature and industry, such as air transport of pollutants, fluidized bed in chemical processes, and dispersion of volcanic ash in the atmosphere. The complexity of the turbulent fluid motion leads to fascinating dynamics of particle suspensions as well as complicated particle-fluid interactions, such as kinetic energy transfer between the solid and gas phases (see Zhao et al. 2013). It is known that the addition of tiny particles can modulate the fluid motion and either augmentation or attenuation of the turbulence has been observed (Balachandar & Eaton 2010, Squires & Eaton 1990). Such phenomena have been widely explored by means of experiments and numerical simulations, such as Squires & Eaton (1990), Pan & Banerjee (1996), Dritselis and Vlachos (2008), Zhao et al. (2010). Kinetic energy budgets are one of the primary tools to examine the turbulent flow. Andersson & Barri (2008) investigated KE transport and conversion in an unladen turbulent plane Couette flow. Mansour et al. (1988) have shown and analysed the Reynolds stress budgets and the turbulent dissipation in a turbulent channel flow. In flows of gas-solid mixtures the suspended solid particles interact with the fluid and make the energy exchange processes more complex than in an unladen channel flow (Balachandar & Eaton 2010). In the presence of particles, a reaction force from each and every particle affects the fluid motion through an extra force term in the NavierStokes equations. The presence of this particle force may give rise to significant modifications of the flow field, both in isotropic turbulence (Squires & Eaton 1990) and in channel flows (Li et al. 2010). In this work the two-way coupled Eulerian-Lagrangian approach is employed to investigate particle suspensions in turbulent channel flow and we mainly focus on the influence of tiny inertial particles on the KE and TKE balance of the particle-laden flow. June 30 July 3, 2015 Melbourne, Australia 9 6C-4
湍流气固通道流动中的能量平衡
本研究的目的是研究颗粒添加剂对湍流气固通道流动中机械能的传递、转换和耗散的影响。为了实现这一目标,我们对气固通道流动进行了双向耦合直接数值模拟(dns)。结果分析采用流体平均流动动能(KE)和流体湍流动能(TKE)方程。为了突出颗粒的影响,将KE预算与无负载通道流(即没有任何添加剂)的结果进行了比较。研究发现,在空载流动中,57.2%的能量直接耗散在平均流动中,40.2%的能量通过平均剪切转化为湍流,然后在小尺度上被粘性作用耗散。相反,在载重颗粒流中,颗粒和流体的相互作用表现在能量收支中。在平均流能量平衡中,平均耗散占供能的59.1%。这与未装载的流量相当。然而,平均流动的能量损失从40.2%下降到13.7%,但部分补偿了新的汇项(24.7%),这代表了粒子所做的负功。结果还表明,平均流动的动能损失给了通道中心区域的粒子,而从近壁区域的粒子那里获得了能量。在TKE收支中,粒子向湍流释放了动能,而这种动能很可能来自平均流。这种额外的能量供应部分补偿了平均剪切产量的大幅下降,约为无载荷通道产量的2/3。最终,TKE是由波动粘性应力引起的变形功耗散的。我们得出结论,粒子在平均流到湍流的能量传递和转换中起着中介作用。颗粒流是最常见的两相流之一,在自然界和工业中都有发现,例如污染物的空中运输,化学过程中的流化床,以及大气中火山灰的分散。湍流运动的复杂性导致了粒子悬浮液的迷人动力学以及复杂的粒子-流体相互作用,例如固相和气相之间的动能传递(见Zhao et al. 2013)。众所周知,微小粒子的加入可以调节流体运动,并且已经观察到湍流的增强或衰减(Balachandar & Eaton 2010, Squires & Eaton 1990)。这种现象已经通过实验和数值模拟进行了广泛的探索,如Squires & Eaton (1990), Pan & Banerjee (1996), Dritselis和Vlachos (2008), Zhao等人(2010)。动能收支是研究湍流的主要工具之一。Andersson & Barri(2008)研究了KE在空载湍流平面Couette流中的输运和转换。Mansour et al.(1988)展示并分析了湍流通道流动中的雷诺应力预算和湍流耗散。在气固混合流动中,悬浮的固体颗粒与流体相互作用,使能量交换过程比在无负载的通道流动中更为复杂(Balachandar & Eaton 2010)。在粒子存在的情况下,来自每个粒子的反作用力通过NavierStokes方程中的一个额外的力项影响流体运动。在各向同性湍流(Squires & Eaton 1990)和通道流(Li et al. 2010)中,这种粒子力的存在可能会引起流场的显著改变。本文采用双向耦合欧拉-拉格朗日方法研究了湍流通道中的颗粒悬浮液,重点研究了微小惯性颗粒对颗粒流的KE和TKE平衡的影响。2015年6月30日2015年7月3日澳大利亚墨尔本96c -4
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信