Effect of external information on the performance in the chin-up/pull-up endurance test

D. Benešová, K. Švátora, P. Kalistová
{"title":"Effect of external information on the performance in the chin-up/pull-up endurance test","authors":"D. Benešová, K. Švátora, P. Kalistová","doi":"10.32725/sk.2020.053","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of the presented research is to assess whether external information can have any impact on the performance in the static strength performance test. The research sample consisted of 60 students at the age of 15-24 years. The test sample consisted of 112 persons (n = 112), of these 50 males and 62 females. The tested persons were randomly divided into three groups. The control group had 35 persons, the positively intervened experimental group of probands consisted of 39 people, and the negatively intervened experimental group of probands consisted of 38 people. Motor performance was represented by a test of static strength ability of upper extremities and torso, endurance in the chinup/pull-up position. All probands performed a pre-test, followed by a post-test one to two weeks apart. Prior to the post-test, positive or negative intervention was performed in the experimental groups. Based on the assessment of the impact of intervention, we used the relative expression of the frequencies of probands of individual groups, who showed improvement, worsening, or stagnation between the pre-test and post-test. We have found that 87% of the probands in the positively intervened group showed improvement, and 74% of the probands in the negatively intervened group showed worsening. This trend has been confirmed statistically and factually. Our experiment has proved that external information can have a significant impact on a subsequent motor performance.","PeriodicalId":179970,"journal":{"name":"Studia Kinanthropologica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studia Kinanthropologica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32725/sk.2020.053","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of the presented research is to assess whether external information can have any impact on the performance in the static strength performance test. The research sample consisted of 60 students at the age of 15-24 years. The test sample consisted of 112 persons (n = 112), of these 50 males and 62 females. The tested persons were randomly divided into three groups. The control group had 35 persons, the positively intervened experimental group of probands consisted of 39 people, and the negatively intervened experimental group of probands consisted of 38 people. Motor performance was represented by a test of static strength ability of upper extremities and torso, endurance in the chinup/pull-up position. All probands performed a pre-test, followed by a post-test one to two weeks apart. Prior to the post-test, positive or negative intervention was performed in the experimental groups. Based on the assessment of the impact of intervention, we used the relative expression of the frequencies of probands of individual groups, who showed improvement, worsening, or stagnation between the pre-test and post-test. We have found that 87% of the probands in the positively intervened group showed improvement, and 74% of the probands in the negatively intervened group showed worsening. This trend has been confirmed statistically and factually. Our experiment has proved that external information can have a significant impact on a subsequent motor performance.
外部信息对引体向上耐力测试成绩的影响
本研究的目的是评估外部信息是否会对静强度性能测试中的性能产生任何影响。研究样本包括60名年龄在15-24岁之间的学生。测试样本包括112人(n = 112),其中男性50人,女性62人。接受测试的人被随机分为三组。对照组35人,积极干预先证者试验组39人,消极干预先证者试验组38人。运动表现由上肢和躯干的静态力量能力测试,引体向上/引体向上姿势的耐力测试来表示。所有先证者进行前测,然后间隔一至两周进行后测。后测前,实验组分别进行正干预和负干预。基于对干预影响的评估,我们使用了在测试前和测试后表现出改善、恶化或停滞的个体组先证者频率的相对表达。我们发现积极干预组有87%的先证者表现出改善,而消极干预组有74%的先证者表现出恶化。这一趋势已得到统计和事实的证实。我们的实验证明,外部信息可以对后续的运动性能产生重大影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信