Comparative Study of Consistency Behavior and Shear Strength of Clayey Soils of Rajshahi District, Bangladesh

A. Nandy, Noosrat Rashid, M. Ashikuzzaman, Syed Abdul Mofiz
{"title":"Comparative Study of Consistency Behavior and Shear Strength of Clayey Soils of Rajshahi District, Bangladesh","authors":"A. Nandy, Noosrat Rashid, M. Ashikuzzaman, Syed Abdul Mofiz","doi":"10.11648/J.JCCEE.20190401.13","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper aims at introducing the Fall Cone Test (FCT) to obtain the shear strength of clayey soils and reveals its applicability by comparing the results obtained from that of Unconfined Compression Test (UCT). Furthermore, the liquid and plastic limit obtained from Casagrande method also compared with that obtained from FCT. For these, soils were collected from Godagari, Tanore, and Nauhata from Rajshahi District (RD). At first, Hydrometer analysis was performed in each soil to know the physical properties. Then Atterberg Limit test was carried out by considering Casagrande Method. After that UCT was shown in each land to find the shear strength of the clay soils. Lastly, FCT was conducted to find out the shear strength, LL and PL. FCT shows a lower amount of liquid and plastic limit than the values measured in the Casagrande Method except plastic limit for Tanore for FCT whereas Godagari shows the higher value of shear strength considering FCT. This research can be concluded with further research should be conducted to ensure its accuracy. On the other hand, it can be drawn which soil have more consistency and shear strength considering others.","PeriodicalId":262934,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Civil, Construction and Environmental Engineering","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Civil, Construction and Environmental Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11648/J.JCCEE.20190401.13","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper aims at introducing the Fall Cone Test (FCT) to obtain the shear strength of clayey soils and reveals its applicability by comparing the results obtained from that of Unconfined Compression Test (UCT). Furthermore, the liquid and plastic limit obtained from Casagrande method also compared with that obtained from FCT. For these, soils were collected from Godagari, Tanore, and Nauhata from Rajshahi District (RD). At first, Hydrometer analysis was performed in each soil to know the physical properties. Then Atterberg Limit test was carried out by considering Casagrande Method. After that UCT was shown in each land to find the shear strength of the clay soils. Lastly, FCT was conducted to find out the shear strength, LL and PL. FCT shows a lower amount of liquid and plastic limit than the values measured in the Casagrande Method except plastic limit for Tanore for FCT whereas Godagari shows the higher value of shear strength considering FCT. This research can be concluded with further research should be conducted to ensure its accuracy. On the other hand, it can be drawn which soil have more consistency and shear strength considering others.
孟加拉Rajshahi地区黏性土的黏性特性及抗剪强度比较研究
本文介绍了测定黏性土抗剪强度的落锥试验(FCT)方法,并通过与无侧限压缩试验(UCT)结果的比较,揭示了该方法的适用性。并将Casagrande法与FCT法的液塑极限进行了比较。为此,从Rajshahi地区的Godagari、Tanore和Nauhata收集土壤。首先,对每种土壤进行比重计分析,以了解其物理性质。然后结合Casagrande法进行Atterberg极限试验。然后在每个土地上显示UCT,以找到粘土的抗剪强度。最后进行FCT计算抗剪强度、LL和PL。FCT除Tanore的塑性极限外,比Casagrande法测得的液量和塑性极限要低,而考虑FCT的Godagari的抗剪强度值要高。本研究可以得出结论,但需要进一步研究以确保其准确性。另一方面,考虑到其他土体,可以得出哪一种土体的黏度和抗剪强度更大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信