An existentialist ethic of technological application and assessment in medicine

Daniel C. Gunn
{"title":"An existentialist ethic of technological application and assessment in medicine","authors":"Daniel C. Gunn","doi":"10.1109/ISTAS.2001.937726","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Medical technology should preserve meaning before prolonging life. It is a matter of justice that technological interventions into circumstances of unavoidable suffering should preserve and facilitate a better understanding of meaning in suffering or alleviate suffering even through hastened death. A longer life is not necessarily a better life. Because of the advancements in medical technology, countless individuals may now be considered chronically ill. Yet, situations of unavoidable suffering may allow for other options such as euthanasia or physician assisted suicide. Technological interventions should be re-evaluated to value an individual assessment of being, not the elongation of life. Such does not prohibit technological interventions, but promotes individual autonomy. Therefore, it is a matter of justice for medical technology to preserve meaning before prolonging life.","PeriodicalId":394055,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings International Symposium on Technology and Society","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2001-07-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings International Symposium on Technology and Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISTAS.2001.937726","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Medical technology should preserve meaning before prolonging life. It is a matter of justice that technological interventions into circumstances of unavoidable suffering should preserve and facilitate a better understanding of meaning in suffering or alleviate suffering even through hastened death. A longer life is not necessarily a better life. Because of the advancements in medical technology, countless individuals may now be considered chronically ill. Yet, situations of unavoidable suffering may allow for other options such as euthanasia or physician assisted suicide. Technological interventions should be re-evaluated to value an individual assessment of being, not the elongation of life. Such does not prohibit technological interventions, but promotes individual autonomy. Therefore, it is a matter of justice for medical technology to preserve meaning before prolonging life.
医学技术应用与评价的存在主义伦理
医疗技术应该在延长生命之前保存意义。对不可避免的痛苦的情况进行技术干预应保持和促进对痛苦的意义的更好理解,或甚至通过加速死亡来减轻痛苦,这是一个公正的问题。更长的寿命不一定是更好的生活。由于医疗技术的进步,无数的人现在可能被认为是慢性病患者。然而,在无法避免痛苦的情况下,可能会有其他选择,如安乐死或医生协助自杀。技术干预应该重新评估,以评估个体的存在,而不是延长寿命。这并不禁止技术干预,而是促进个人自主权。因此,医疗技术应该在延长生命之前先保留生命的意义,这是一个公正的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信