Dismantling the Dispositif: Social Science Experiments in the Classroom

N. de Klerk
{"title":"Dismantling the Dispositif: Social Science Experiments in the Classroom","authors":"N. de Klerk","doi":"10.18146/tmg.831","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The following is a case study of a series of pioneering tests with visual teaching aids in elementary and secondary schools in the United States, conducted between 1920 and 1923. As it happened, these tests coincided with similar experiments in the Netherlands. Although unbeknown to each other, the innovative aspect of both studies consisted in taking their research into the classroom. With this measure experimenters in both countries hoped to collect well-founded evidence to refute what appeared to them as unfounded or overstated claims about photography-based, visual teaching aids, film in particular. While the experimenters forwent a controlled lab situation, by entering the classroom they nonetheless introduced adjustments into everyday educational practice, whether it concerned the activities required of pupils, staff, the interactions between them, and/or the composition of test groups. Thus, they changed what today one would call the educational dispostif: the arrangement of a presentation (a lesson by staff) in a designated space (a classroom with its equipment) before an assemblage of attendees (a class of pupils). Although the term educational dispositif was not current at the time, the experimenters did comment on the elements that constitute it. And given elementary and secondary education’s time-honoured routines, they were bound to stumble upon these elements’ interdependence and reconsider, albeit not in so many words, their conception of what goes on in a class. I largely focus on the American experimentsbecause they are more numerous, more invasive, and more extensively discussed in the 1924 book Visual education. The Dutch experiments, on which I published elsewhere, consisted of two, less invasive series, conducted in one secondary school, and were reported on in two articles, in 1923, and one English translation, in 1924.","PeriodicalId":187553,"journal":{"name":"TMG Journal for Media History","volume":"71 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"TMG Journal for Media History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18146/tmg.831","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The following is a case study of a series of pioneering tests with visual teaching aids in elementary and secondary schools in the United States, conducted between 1920 and 1923. As it happened, these tests coincided with similar experiments in the Netherlands. Although unbeknown to each other, the innovative aspect of both studies consisted in taking their research into the classroom. With this measure experimenters in both countries hoped to collect well-founded evidence to refute what appeared to them as unfounded or overstated claims about photography-based, visual teaching aids, film in particular. While the experimenters forwent a controlled lab situation, by entering the classroom they nonetheless introduced adjustments into everyday educational practice, whether it concerned the activities required of pupils, staff, the interactions between them, and/or the composition of test groups. Thus, they changed what today one would call the educational dispostif: the arrangement of a presentation (a lesson by staff) in a designated space (a classroom with its equipment) before an assemblage of attendees (a class of pupils). Although the term educational dispositif was not current at the time, the experimenters did comment on the elements that constitute it. And given elementary and secondary education’s time-honoured routines, they were bound to stumble upon these elements’ interdependence and reconsider, albeit not in so many words, their conception of what goes on in a class. I largely focus on the American experimentsbecause they are more numerous, more invasive, and more extensively discussed in the 1924 book Visual education. The Dutch experiments, on which I published elsewhere, consisted of two, less invasive series, conducted in one secondary school, and were reported on in two articles, in 1923, and one English translation, in 1924.
拆解意向:课堂上的社会科学实验
以下是1920年至1923年期间在美国中小学进行的一系列具有开创性的视觉教学辅助测试的案例研究。碰巧的是,这些测试与荷兰的类似实验相吻合。虽然彼此不了解,但这两项研究的创新之处在于将他们的研究带入了课堂。两国的实验人员都希望通过这一措施收集有充分根据的证据,来反驳那些在他们看来毫无根据或夸大其词的关于以摄影为基础的视觉教学辅助工具,尤其是电影的说法。虽然实验者放弃了受控的实验室环境,但通过进入教室,他们仍然在日常教育实践中引入了调整,无论是涉及学生,教职员工的活动要求,他们之间的互动,还是测试小组的组成。因此,他们改变了今天人们所说的教育安排:在一个指定的空间(一个带设备的教室),在一群与会者(一个班级的学生)面前安排一次演讲(教职员的一堂课)。尽管当时“教育倾向”一词并不流行,但实验者确实对构成它的要素发表了评论。鉴于中小学教育历史悠久的惯例,他们一定会偶然发现这些因素的相互依存关系,并重新考虑他们对课堂上发生的事情的看法,尽管不是用那么多的语言。我主要关注美国的实验,因为在1924年出版的《视觉教育》一书中,它们的数量更多,更具侵入性,讨论也更广泛。我在其他地方发表的荷兰实验,包括两个不那么具有侵入性的系列,在一所中学进行,并在1923年的两篇文章和1924年的一篇英文翻译中进行了报道。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信