A comparison of scanning algorithms

C. G. van den Berg, M. Kersten, K. Blom
{"title":"A comparison of scanning algorithms","authors":"C. G. van den Berg, M. Kersten, K. Blom","doi":"10.1109/PARBSE.1990.77226","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Three implementation techniques for main memory database systems are described and compared, namely, the compilation, vectorization, and adaptive methods. The adaptive method can be combined with the standard, compilation, and vectorization methods. Experiments show that, with standard optimization techniques like vectorization and compilation, a performance increase of a factor of five can be obtained. The adaptive method turned out to be favorable only in combination with the vectorization and compilation approach. Experience with applying these techniques indicates that the performance increase is well worth the added implementation effort for both the compilation and vectorization approach.<<ETX>>","PeriodicalId":389644,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings. PARBASE-90: International Conference on Databases, Parallel Architectures, and Their Applications","volume":"93 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1990-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings. PARBASE-90: International Conference on Databases, Parallel Architectures, and Their Applications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/PARBSE.1990.77226","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Three implementation techniques for main memory database systems are described and compared, namely, the compilation, vectorization, and adaptive methods. The adaptive method can be combined with the standard, compilation, and vectorization methods. Experiments show that, with standard optimization techniques like vectorization and compilation, a performance increase of a factor of five can be obtained. The adaptive method turned out to be favorable only in combination with the vectorization and compilation approach. Experience with applying these techniques indicates that the performance increase is well worth the added implementation effort for both the compilation and vectorization approach.<>
扫描算法的比较
介绍并比较了主存数据库系统的三种实现技术,即编译方法、向量化方法和自适应方法。自适应方法可以与标准方法、编译方法和矢量化方法相结合。实验表明,通过向量化和编译等标准优化技术,可以获得5倍的性能提升。结果表明,自适应方法只有与矢量化和编译方法相结合才能发挥良好的效果。应用这些技术的经验表明,对于编译和向量化方法来说,性能的提高是值得的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信