Who Really Wants Automated Vehicles? Determinant Factors of Acceptability Profiles in Portugal

L. Cunha, D. Silva, Daniela Monteiro, Sara Ferreira, António Lobo, António Couto, A. Simões, Catarina Neto
{"title":"Who Really Wants Automated Vehicles? Determinant Factors of Acceptability Profiles in Portugal","authors":"L. Cunha, D. Silva, Daniela Monteiro, Sara Ferreira, António Lobo, António Couto, A. Simões, Catarina Neto","doi":"10.54941/ahfe1001018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Addressing the acceptability of automated vehicles (AVs) implies, beyond technical, legal, or ethical aspects, the debate on perceptions and use intentions. The focus of this study is placed on questioning the technique by the social dimension: what acceptability profiles emerge from these perceptions? This study analyzes the determinant factors of AVs acceptability to identify different Portuguese population clusters. A survey was developed, in the scope of the AUTODRIVING project, with 501 participants. Three acceptability clusters were identified: Objectors; Ambivalent; and Enthusiasts. To complement these results, five focus groups were carried out, involving both professional and regular drivers. The results enabled the access to a situated point of view, considering the current experience of driving, particularly in the case of professional drivers. This study could contribute to deploying AVs, highlighting the importance of a contextualized analysis hic and nunc, and allowing to bring to the fore the demands and constraints of driving.","PeriodicalId":292077,"journal":{"name":"Intelligent Human Systems Integration (IHSI 2022) Integrating People and Intelligent Systems","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Intelligent Human Systems Integration (IHSI 2022) Integrating People and Intelligent Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54941/ahfe1001018","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Addressing the acceptability of automated vehicles (AVs) implies, beyond technical, legal, or ethical aspects, the debate on perceptions and use intentions. The focus of this study is placed on questioning the technique by the social dimension: what acceptability profiles emerge from these perceptions? This study analyzes the determinant factors of AVs acceptability to identify different Portuguese population clusters. A survey was developed, in the scope of the AUTODRIVING project, with 501 participants. Three acceptability clusters were identified: Objectors; Ambivalent; and Enthusiasts. To complement these results, five focus groups were carried out, involving both professional and regular drivers. The results enabled the access to a situated point of view, considering the current experience of driving, particularly in the case of professional drivers. This study could contribute to deploying AVs, highlighting the importance of a contextualized analysis hic and nunc, and allowing to bring to the fore the demands and constraints of driving.
谁真正想要自动驾驶汽车?葡萄牙可接受性概况的决定因素
解决自动驾驶汽车(AVs)的可接受性问题,除了技术、法律或道德方面的问题外,还意味着关于认知和使用意图的辩论。本研究的重点是通过社会维度对技术提出质疑:从这些感知中出现了什么可接受的概况?本研究分析了av可接受性的决定因素,以确定不同的葡萄牙人口群。在自动驾驶项目的范围内开展了一项调查,共有501名参与者。确定了三组可接受性:反对者;矛盾的;和爱好者。为了补充这些结果,开展了五个焦点小组,包括专业司机和普通司机。考虑到当前的驾驶经验,特别是在专业驾驶员的情况下,研究结果使人们能够获得一个定位的观点。这项研究可以为自动驾驶汽车的部署做出贡献,突出背景分析的重要性,并将驾驶的需求和限制放在首位。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信