The comparison of predictive scheduling algorithms for different sizes of job shop scheduling problems

I. Paprocka, W. Kempa, C. Grabowik, K. Kalinowski, D. Krenczyk
{"title":"The comparison of predictive scheduling algorithms for different sizes of job shop scheduling problems","authors":"I. Paprocka, W. Kempa, C. Grabowik, K. Kalinowski, D. Krenczyk","doi":"10.1088/1757-899X/145/4/042019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the paper a survey of predictive and reactive scheduling methods is done in order to evaluate how the ability of prediction of reliability characteristics influences over robustness criteria. The most important reliability characteristics are: Mean Time to Failure, Mean Time of Repair. Survey analysis is done for a job shop scheduling problem. The paper answers the question: what method generates robust schedules in the case of a bottleneck failure occurrence before, at the beginning of planned maintenance actions or after planned maintenance actions? Efficiency of predictive schedules is evaluated using criteria: makespan, total tardiness, flow time, idle time. Efficiency of reactive schedules is evaluated using: solution robustness criterion and quality robustness criterion. This paper is the continuation of the research conducted in the paper [1], where the survey of predictive and reactive scheduling methods is done only for small size scheduling problems.","PeriodicalId":359151,"journal":{"name":"IOP Conf. Series: Materials Science and Engineering","volume":"116 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IOP Conf. Series: Materials Science and Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/145/4/042019","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

In the paper a survey of predictive and reactive scheduling methods is done in order to evaluate how the ability of prediction of reliability characteristics influences over robustness criteria. The most important reliability characteristics are: Mean Time to Failure, Mean Time of Repair. Survey analysis is done for a job shop scheduling problem. The paper answers the question: what method generates robust schedules in the case of a bottleneck failure occurrence before, at the beginning of planned maintenance actions or after planned maintenance actions? Efficiency of predictive schedules is evaluated using criteria: makespan, total tardiness, flow time, idle time. Efficiency of reactive schedules is evaluated using: solution robustness criterion and quality robustness criterion. This paper is the continuation of the research conducted in the paper [1], where the survey of predictive and reactive scheduling methods is done only for small size scheduling problems.
针对不同规模作业车间调度问题的预测调度算法比较
本文对预测调度和反应调度方法进行了综述,以评估可靠性特性预测能力对鲁棒性准则的影响。最重要的可靠性特性是:平均无故障时间,平均维修时间。针对某作业车间调度问题进行了调查分析。本文回答了这样一个问题:在计划维护行动之前、开始时或计划维护行动之后发生瓶颈故障的情况下,什么方法可以生成鲁棒调度?预测计划的效率是用以下标准来评估的:完工时间、总延误时间、流动时间、闲置时间。采用方案鲁棒性准则和质量鲁棒性准则评价反应调度的效率。本文是文献[1]研究的延续,在文献[1]中,仅针对小规模调度问题对预测型和反应型调度方法进行了调查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信