Dysphonia and its Correlation with Acoustic Voice Parameters

Kavita Sachdeva, T. Shrivastava
{"title":"Dysphonia and its Correlation with Acoustic Voice Parameters","authors":"Kavita Sachdeva, T. Shrivastava","doi":"10.5005/jp-journals-10023-1151","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: To evaluate the laryngeal causes of dysphonia, correlation of acoustic voice analysis with Indirect laryngoscopic/ endoscopic findings in various voice disorders. Study design: Hospital based prospective observational study. Materials and methods: Forty patients attending the ear nose throat (ENT) outpatient department (OPD) at a Tertiary Care Government Hospital in one year, with dysphonia for more than 15 days were selected. History, examination, endoscopy, voice analysis was done. For consensus auditory-perceptual evaluation of voice (CAPE-V), the voice was analyzed under the following parameters: roughness, breathiness, strain, pitch, loudness, overall severity. Scores were given out of 100. For acoustic analysis, a computer-based software Praat was used based on jitter, shimmer, noise-harmonic ratio and mean pitch. Result: Benign lesions were most common in adults of age group 21 to 40 years, and malignancy in 41 to 50 years and 61 to 70 years; with male preponderance (4.7:1). Isolated vocal cord palsy (32.5%) was the most common lesion presenting with dysphonia, followed by malignancy (25%). Out of benign lesions, vocal polyp (10%) and nodule (10%) were the commonest, with equal incidence. On analyzing the voice, jitter and shimmer were found to be important parameters depicting the perturbation in frequency and amplitude, respectively. These parameters, indirectly, gave an idea about the vibratory motion of the vocal cords. On statistical analysis, jitter and shimmer showed significant direct correlation with the severity of dysphonia (jitter>shimmer). Noise to harmonic ratio (NHR) was raised in a significant number of dysphonic patients, with direct correlation with an increase in jitter. Although a significant relationship between the variation in mean pitch and CAPE V could not be established in this study; instrumental analysis was still useful in documentation and quantification of mean pitch in various dysphonic samples. Conclusion: Acoustic measurement of voice is a simple yet powerful tool to analyze the patients with dysphonic voice.","PeriodicalId":258448,"journal":{"name":"International journal of phonosurgery and laryngology","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of phonosurgery and laryngology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10023-1151","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Aim: To evaluate the laryngeal causes of dysphonia, correlation of acoustic voice analysis with Indirect laryngoscopic/ endoscopic findings in various voice disorders. Study design: Hospital based prospective observational study. Materials and methods: Forty patients attending the ear nose throat (ENT) outpatient department (OPD) at a Tertiary Care Government Hospital in one year, with dysphonia for more than 15 days were selected. History, examination, endoscopy, voice analysis was done. For consensus auditory-perceptual evaluation of voice (CAPE-V), the voice was analyzed under the following parameters: roughness, breathiness, strain, pitch, loudness, overall severity. Scores were given out of 100. For acoustic analysis, a computer-based software Praat was used based on jitter, shimmer, noise-harmonic ratio and mean pitch. Result: Benign lesions were most common in adults of age group 21 to 40 years, and malignancy in 41 to 50 years and 61 to 70 years; with male preponderance (4.7:1). Isolated vocal cord palsy (32.5%) was the most common lesion presenting with dysphonia, followed by malignancy (25%). Out of benign lesions, vocal polyp (10%) and nodule (10%) were the commonest, with equal incidence. On analyzing the voice, jitter and shimmer were found to be important parameters depicting the perturbation in frequency and amplitude, respectively. These parameters, indirectly, gave an idea about the vibratory motion of the vocal cords. On statistical analysis, jitter and shimmer showed significant direct correlation with the severity of dysphonia (jitter>shimmer). Noise to harmonic ratio (NHR) was raised in a significant number of dysphonic patients, with direct correlation with an increase in jitter. Although a significant relationship between the variation in mean pitch and CAPE V could not be established in this study; instrumental analysis was still useful in documentation and quantification of mean pitch in various dysphonic samples. Conclusion: Acoustic measurement of voice is a simple yet powerful tool to analyze the patients with dysphonic voice.
发声障碍及其与声学语音参数的相关性
目的:探讨喉部发声障碍的病因,以及各种声音障碍的声学分析与间接喉镜/内窥镜检查结果的相关性。研究设计:基于医院的前瞻性观察研究。材料与方法:选取某三级政府医院耳鼻喉科(ENT)门诊(OPD)一年内出现发声障碍15天以上的患者40例。做了病史,检查,内窥镜检查,声音分析。对于声音的一致听觉感知评价(CAPE-V),根据以下参数对声音进行分析:粗糙度,呼吸,张力,音高,响度,整体严重程度。满分为100分。声学分析采用基于抖动、闪烁、噪声谐波比和平均音高的计算机软件Praat。结果:21 ~ 40岁以良性病变居多,41 ~ 50岁、61 ~ 70岁以恶性病变居多;男性优势(4.7:1)。孤立性声带麻痹(32.5%)是最常见的表现为发声障碍的病变,其次是恶性肿瘤(25%)。在良性病变中,以声带息肉(10%)和声带结节(10%)最为常见,两者发病率相当。通过对声音的分析,发现抖动和闪烁分别是描述频率和幅度扰动的重要参数。这些参数,间接地给出了声带振动运动的概念。经统计分析,抖动和闪烁与语音障碍的严重程度有显著的直接相关(抖动>闪烁)。噪声谐波比(NHR)在大量发声障碍患者中显著升高,与抖动增加直接相关。虽然本研究无法确定平均音高变化与CAPE V之间的显著关系;仪器分析仍然是有用的文件和定量平均音高在各种不和谐的样品。结论:声测法是一种简单而有力的分析发声障碍患者的工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信