Determining Surface Stimulation Parameters With Computational Cardiac Electrophysiology to Defibrillate Human Ventricles

Angel Moreno, R. Walton, C. Hawks, O. Bernus, E. Vigmond, J. Bayer
{"title":"Determining Surface Stimulation Parameters With Computational Cardiac Electrophysiology to Defibrillate Human Ventricles","authors":"Angel Moreno, R. Walton, C. Hawks, O. Bernus, E. Vigmond, J. Bayer","doi":"10.22489/CinC.2018.118","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: To determine the minimal surface stimulus strength necessary to defibrillate human ventricles. Methods: We determined this in a 10cmx10cmx1cm finite element model of left ventricular (LV) tissue with human electrophysiology. It was paced until steady-state at 1.3 Hz with S1 stimuli (LV apex) at 2x threshold. A single S2 stimulus (apical posterior corner) was delivered at 2x threshold 300 ms after the last S1 to initiate reentry at the model's center. To terminate reentry, an S3 stimulus on the entire epicardial, endocardial, or both surfaces was applied 2 seconds after S2. Starting at the capture threshold, S3 strength was doubled until reentry terminated. Results: Minimum stimulus strength to terminate reentry with endocardial and epicardial S3 was > 512-fold capture threshold, but only 16-fold for S3 applied to both surfaces simultaneously. Extending the S3 depth to the midmyocardium lowered the minimum stimulus strength for defibrillation to 8-fold capture threshold on the endocardium and 16-fold on the epicardium. This difference corresponds to a longer wavelength for reentry in the endocardium versus epicardium (6.6 cm vs 5.3 cm). Conclusion: Stimulating both the endocardial and epicardial surfaces at $\\ge 16$ times capture threshold is optimal to defibrillate human ventricles, and is decreased further for stimuli applied deeper in the tissue.","PeriodicalId":215521,"journal":{"name":"2018 Computing in Cardiology Conference (CinC)","volume":"113 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 Computing in Cardiology Conference (CinC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22489/CinC.2018.118","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: To determine the minimal surface stimulus strength necessary to defibrillate human ventricles. Methods: We determined this in a 10cmx10cmx1cm finite element model of left ventricular (LV) tissue with human electrophysiology. It was paced until steady-state at 1.3 Hz with S1 stimuli (LV apex) at 2x threshold. A single S2 stimulus (apical posterior corner) was delivered at 2x threshold 300 ms after the last S1 to initiate reentry at the model's center. To terminate reentry, an S3 stimulus on the entire epicardial, endocardial, or both surfaces was applied 2 seconds after S2. Starting at the capture threshold, S3 strength was doubled until reentry terminated. Results: Minimum stimulus strength to terminate reentry with endocardial and epicardial S3 was > 512-fold capture threshold, but only 16-fold for S3 applied to both surfaces simultaneously. Extending the S3 depth to the midmyocardium lowered the minimum stimulus strength for defibrillation to 8-fold capture threshold on the endocardium and 16-fold on the epicardium. This difference corresponds to a longer wavelength for reentry in the endocardium versus epicardium (6.6 cm vs 5.3 cm). Conclusion: Stimulating both the endocardial and epicardial surfaces at $\ge 16$ times capture threshold is optimal to defibrillate human ventricles, and is decreased further for stimuli applied deeper in the tissue.
用计算心脏电生理确定表面刺激参数以使人心室除颤
目的:确定心室除颤所需的最小表面刺激强度。方法:采用10cmx10cmx1cm的人左心室(LV)组织电生理有限元模型进行测定。在2倍阈值的S1刺激(LV顶点)下,在1.3 Hz下定速直到稳定状态。在最后一次S1后300 ms,以2倍阈值给予单次S2刺激(根尖后角),以启动模型中心的再入。为了终止再入,S2后2秒对整个心外膜、心内膜或两表面施加S3刺激。从捕获阈值开始,S3强度加倍,直到重新进入终止。结果:心内膜和心外膜S3终止再入的最小刺激强度为512倍,而同时施加于两表面的S3仅为16倍。将S3深度延伸至心肌中部,使除颤的最小刺激强度降低至心内膜捕获阈值的8倍和心外膜捕获阈值的16倍。这种差异对应于心内膜比心外膜再入的波长更长(6.6 cm比5.3 cm)。结论:以16次捕获阈值同时刺激心内膜表面和心外膜表面是人类心室除颤的最佳方法,而在组织深处施加刺激时,该阈值进一步降低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信