Effectiveness of Online and Traditional Class: A Comparative Analysis

Kingie G. Micabalo, Jesszon B. Cano, June Ace P. Navarro, Lucilito A. Atillo, Ryan D. Montilla
{"title":"Effectiveness of Online and Traditional Class: A Comparative Analysis","authors":"Kingie G. Micabalo, Jesszon B. Cano, June Ace P. Navarro, Lucilito A. Atillo, Ryan D. Montilla","doi":"10.51983/ajes-2020.9.2.2554","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Educating and learning modalities in virtual and customary classes can be best seen as a marker of proficiency and college adequacy. The examination decides the adequacy of online and traditional classes to the College of Business and Accountancy. The respondents were the 208 understudies from the University of Cebu Lapu and Mandaue utilizing the descriptive - comparative research method on a snowball sampling. Frequency and simple percentage, Mean, Chi- Square Test of Independence and Independent Samples T-test were utilized, to sum up, separate, and unwind the information assembled. The findings revealed that there is statistically significant difference on the level of effectiveness between online and traditional class. The understudies perceived online class as moderately effective while perceiving traditional class as highly effective. Moreover, it revealed that there is a statistically significant correlation on the respondents gender, course and year level on the level of perception either by traditional or online classes. The study concludes that Online and Traditional modalities of educating and learning extraordinarily assume an essential function on an understudy's useful term in school. However, refinement of approaches to these modalities is very important to portray student-teacher resiliency at any given situation.","PeriodicalId":365290,"journal":{"name":"Asian Journal of Electrical Sciences","volume":"66 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Journal of Electrical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51983/ajes-2020.9.2.2554","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Educating and learning modalities in virtual and customary classes can be best seen as a marker of proficiency and college adequacy. The examination decides the adequacy of online and traditional classes to the College of Business and Accountancy. The respondents were the 208 understudies from the University of Cebu Lapu and Mandaue utilizing the descriptive - comparative research method on a snowball sampling. Frequency and simple percentage, Mean, Chi- Square Test of Independence and Independent Samples T-test were utilized, to sum up, separate, and unwind the information assembled. The findings revealed that there is statistically significant difference on the level of effectiveness between online and traditional class. The understudies perceived online class as moderately effective while perceiving traditional class as highly effective. Moreover, it revealed that there is a statistically significant correlation on the respondents gender, course and year level on the level of perception either by traditional or online classes. The study concludes that Online and Traditional modalities of educating and learning extraordinarily assume an essential function on an understudy's useful term in school. However, refinement of approaches to these modalities is very important to portray student-teacher resiliency at any given situation.
网络课堂与传统课堂的有效性比较分析
虚拟课堂和习惯课堂的教育和学习方式可以最好地被视为熟练程度和大学充分性的标志。考试决定了工商会计学院在线课程和传统课程的充分性。调查对象为宿务拉普大学和曼达维大学的208名学生,采用滚雪球抽样的描述性比较研究方法。使用频率和简单百分比,均值,独立性卡方检验和独立样本t检验,对集合的信息进行汇总,分离和unwind。研究结果显示,在线课堂和传统课堂在有效性水平上存在统计学上的显著差异。学生们认为网络课堂效果中等,而传统课堂效果较高。此外,该研究还发现,受访者的性别、课程和年级对传统课程和在线课程的感知水平存在统计学上显著的相关性。该研究的结论是,在线和传统的教育和学习方式对学生在学校的有用时间起着至关重要的作用。然而,改进这些模式的方法对于在任何给定情况下描绘学生-教师弹性是非常重要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信