Professionalization in Safety: A Study of the Fundamental Knowledge of Future Safety Professionals

W. V. Wassenhove, Christian Foussard
{"title":"Professionalization in Safety: A Study of the Fundamental Knowledge of Future Safety Professionals","authors":"W. V. Wassenhove, Christian Foussard","doi":"10.3850/978-981-14-8593-0_4874-CD","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This contribution to the ESREL conference will present an expérimentation about testing fundamental knowledge of future safety professionals. The post master Management of Industrial Risks has graduated more than 250 students since 2004. The program addresses Occupational Health and Safety and Industrial Safety topics. Most of the students find a job related to one of those two domains. The program recruits among a large panel of Master Programs, going from Safety, Health, Quality, and Environment. Students then follow a 500 hours program and they do a 1000 hours internship. The question we arise is “What is the fundamental knowledge a safety professional needs to master?” And how can we assure that a student graduated from the program masters this knowledge? This article will present how fundamental knowledge for safety professionals is identified and how this knowledge is assessed. A fundamental knowledge assessment was done on one cohort of students and their feedback on this test is collected. This kind of test develops their meta-knowledge in the safety domain. A critical reflection about learning in the safety domain and quality analysis of safety education programs is made and perspectives about future curricula are proposed.","PeriodicalId":201963,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 30th European Safety and Reliability Conference and 15th Probabilistic Safety Assessment and Management Conference","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 30th European Safety and Reliability Conference and 15th Probabilistic Safety Assessment and Management Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3850/978-981-14-8593-0_4874-CD","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

This contribution to the ESREL conference will present an expérimentation about testing fundamental knowledge of future safety professionals. The post master Management of Industrial Risks has graduated more than 250 students since 2004. The program addresses Occupational Health and Safety and Industrial Safety topics. Most of the students find a job related to one of those two domains. The program recruits among a large panel of Master Programs, going from Safety, Health, Quality, and Environment. Students then follow a 500 hours program and they do a 1000 hours internship. The question we arise is “What is the fundamental knowledge a safety professional needs to master?” And how can we assure that a student graduated from the program masters this knowledge? This article will present how fundamental knowledge for safety professionals is identified and how this knowledge is assessed. A fundamental knowledge assessment was done on one cohort of students and their feedback on this test is collected. This kind of test develops their meta-knowledge in the safety domain. A critical reflection about learning in the safety domain and quality analysis of safety education programs is made and perspectives about future curricula are proposed.
安全的专业化:未来安全专业人员基本知识的研究
这篇对ESREL会议的贡献将介绍一个关于测试未来安全专业人员基本知识的实验。自2004年以来,工业风险管理硕士研究生已毕业250多名学生。该方案涉及职业健康与安全以及工业安全主题。大多数学生都能找到与这两个领域之一相关的工作。该项目从安全、健康、质量和环境等众多硕士项目中招募人才。学生们要完成500个小时的课程,然后做1000个小时的实习。我们提出的问题是“安全专业人员需要掌握的基本知识是什么?”我们怎样才能保证毕业的学生掌握这些知识呢?本文将介绍如何确定安全专业人员的基本知识以及如何评估这些知识。对一组学生进行了基础知识评估,并收集了他们对该测试的反馈。这种测试发展了他们在安全领域的元知识。对安全领域的学习进行了批判性反思,对安全教育项目的质量进行了分析,并对未来的课程提出了展望。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信