104 Reducing unwarranted variations in frequency of coronary angiographies in germany by describing, understanding and modifying local practice

N. Gerlach, Kathrin Schlößler, J. Steinbuck, Julian Bleek, C. Günster, U. Marschall, U. Schneider, D. Horenkamp-Sonntag, L. Sundmacher, H. König, U. Zeymer, S. Schneider, K. Werdan, Marc Weber, C. Schäfer, D. Klemperer, I. Kopp, M. Nothacker, N. Donner‐Banzhoff
{"title":"104 Reducing unwarranted variations in frequency of coronary angiographies in germany by describing, understanding and modifying local practice","authors":"N. Gerlach, Kathrin Schlößler, J. Steinbuck, Julian Bleek, C. Günster, U. Marschall, U. Schneider, D. Horenkamp-Sonntag, L. Sundmacher, H. König, U. Zeymer, S. Schneider, K. Werdan, Marc Weber, C. Schäfer, D. Klemperer, I. Kopp, M. Nothacker, N. Donner‐Banzhoff","doi":"10.1136/BMJEBM-2018-111070.104","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives Germany has one of the highest numbers of coronary angiography worldwide. Nevertheless, we find a great variation between German regions for both, diagnostic coronary angiographies and percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI). We assume that this variation is not only due to variation in morbidity but also reflects factors such as guideline adherence, physician-patient communication and access to care. In this mixed method project, we aim to first describe the variation of coronary angiographies and PCIs in different German regions. Secondly, we explore current practices and motives for (non-)adherences to guidelines in the diagnostic process of patients with suspected CHD. Based on these results, we consequently plan to develop a complex intervention (treatment pathway) to improve guideline adherence and thus appropriateness of coronary angiography. Method The projects will be organized according to the recommendation of the Medical Research Council for the development and evaluation of complex interventions. The first study will use descriptive methods based on routine data of three German Health Care Insurances and registry data to describe status quo and associated factors of coronary angiography. The second study will use qualitative methods to understand barriers and facilitators of guideline adherence and medical decision making. Furthermore, we will discuss variations in care and thereby identify implementation targets for the planned treatment pathway. Based on this information, we will develop local treatment pathways in four selected regions. Relevant peers will develop the local pathway in group discussions. Using this bottom-up approach, we directly address implementation challenges.","PeriodicalId":103956,"journal":{"name":"Poster and conversation presentations","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Poster and conversation presentations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/BMJEBM-2018-111070.104","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives Germany has one of the highest numbers of coronary angiography worldwide. Nevertheless, we find a great variation between German regions for both, diagnostic coronary angiographies and percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI). We assume that this variation is not only due to variation in morbidity but also reflects factors such as guideline adherence, physician-patient communication and access to care. In this mixed method project, we aim to first describe the variation of coronary angiographies and PCIs in different German regions. Secondly, we explore current practices and motives for (non-)adherences to guidelines in the diagnostic process of patients with suspected CHD. Based on these results, we consequently plan to develop a complex intervention (treatment pathway) to improve guideline adherence and thus appropriateness of coronary angiography. Method The projects will be organized according to the recommendation of the Medical Research Council for the development and evaluation of complex interventions. The first study will use descriptive methods based on routine data of three German Health Care Insurances and registry data to describe status quo and associated factors of coronary angiography. The second study will use qualitative methods to understand barriers and facilitators of guideline adherence and medical decision making. Furthermore, we will discuss variations in care and thereby identify implementation targets for the planned treatment pathway. Based on this information, we will develop local treatment pathways in four selected regions. Relevant peers will develop the local pathway in group discussions. Using this bottom-up approach, we directly address implementation challenges.
104通过描述、理解和修改当地实践,减少德国冠状动脉造影频率的不必要变化
目的:德国是世界上冠状动脉造影人数最多的国家之一。然而,我们发现德国地区在诊断冠状动脉造影和经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)方面存在很大差异。我们认为这种差异不仅是由于发病率的差异,还反映了诸如指南依从性、医患沟通和获得护理等因素。在这个混合方法项目中,我们的目标是首先描述冠状动脉造影和pci在德国不同地区的变化。其次,我们探讨目前的做法和动机(不)遵守指南的诊断过程中,怀疑冠心病患者。基于这些结果,我们计划开发一种复杂的干预(治疗途径)来提高指南的依从性,从而提高冠状动脉造影的适当性。方法根据医学研究委员会的建议,组织开展复杂干预措施的开发和评估。第一项研究将采用描述性方法,基于三个德国医疗保险的常规数据和登记数据来描述冠状动脉造影的现状和相关因素。第二项研究将使用定性方法来了解指南依从性和医疗决策的障碍和促进因素。此外,我们将讨论护理的变化,从而确定计划治疗途径的实施目标。根据这些信息,我们将在四个选定区域制定当地治疗途径。相关同行将在小组讨论中发展本地路径。使用这种自底向上的方法,我们可以直接解决实现方面的挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信