A pilot study of self-assessment of word processing and presentation software skills in graduate students in technical communication

K. Hopper, K. T. Rainey
{"title":"A pilot study of self-assessment of word processing and presentation software skills in graduate students in technical communication","authors":"K. Hopper, K. T. Rainey","doi":"10.1109/IPCC.2003.1245496","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Technological literacy-both at the skills level and at the conceptual/critical level-is a crucial part of technical communication pedagogy. A pilot study examining self-assessment of word processing (Microsoft Word) and presentation application (Microsoft PowerPoint) skills was performed in a graduate course in technical communication. Study population comprised 13 students who completed an online survey of perceptions of proficiency in word processing and presentation software, followed by online examination using a commercial evaluation and remediation package (Skills Assessment Manager [SAM] and Training Online Manager [TOM] by Thomson Learning). SAM exams simulated PowerPoint and Word operations, and were adapted from Microsoft Office User Specialist (MOUS) preparation instruments, based on skills objectives for Microsoft certification. Participants accessed the TOM online tutorial, and performed a second set of equivalent exams, 62% accurately self-assessed skill level in PowerPoint, while 38% overestimated skill. 23% accurately self-assessed skill level in Word, while 11% overestimated skill. Mean difference between pre and post-training PowerPoint scores was 14.38%, statistically significant (p < .001). Mean difference between pre and post-training Word combined scores was 10.46%, statistically significant (p < .001), Participants expressed appreciation for attention to foundational technical tools skills. A long term, refined study will follow.","PeriodicalId":439913,"journal":{"name":"IEEE International Professional Communication Conference, 2003. IPCC 2003. Proceedings.","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE International Professional Communication Conference, 2003. IPCC 2003. Proceedings.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IPCC.2003.1245496","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Technological literacy-both at the skills level and at the conceptual/critical level-is a crucial part of technical communication pedagogy. A pilot study examining self-assessment of word processing (Microsoft Word) and presentation application (Microsoft PowerPoint) skills was performed in a graduate course in technical communication. Study population comprised 13 students who completed an online survey of perceptions of proficiency in word processing and presentation software, followed by online examination using a commercial evaluation and remediation package (Skills Assessment Manager [SAM] and Training Online Manager [TOM] by Thomson Learning). SAM exams simulated PowerPoint and Word operations, and were adapted from Microsoft Office User Specialist (MOUS) preparation instruments, based on skills objectives for Microsoft certification. Participants accessed the TOM online tutorial, and performed a second set of equivalent exams, 62% accurately self-assessed skill level in PowerPoint, while 38% overestimated skill. 23% accurately self-assessed skill level in Word, while 11% overestimated skill. Mean difference between pre and post-training PowerPoint scores was 14.38%, statistically significant (p < .001). Mean difference between pre and post-training Word combined scores was 10.46%, statistically significant (p < .001), Participants expressed appreciation for attention to foundational technical tools skills. A long term, refined study will follow.
技术传播学研究生文字处理与演示软件技能自我评估的初步研究
技术素养——无论是在技能层面还是在概念/关键层面——是技术传播教学法的重要组成部分。一项关于文字处理(微软word)和演示应用(微软PowerPoint)技能自我评估的试点研究在技术通信研究生课程中进行。研究对象包括13名学生,他们完成了对文字处理和演示软件熟练程度的在线调查,随后使用商业评估和补救软件包(Thomson Learning的技能评估管理器[SAM]和培训在线管理器[TOM])进行在线考试。SAM考试模拟了PowerPoint和Word的操作,并改编自微软Office用户专家(mou)的准备工具,基于微软认证的技能目标。参与者参加了TOM在线教程,并进行了第二组等效的测试,62%的人在PowerPoint中准确地自我评估了技能水平,而38%的人高估了技能水平。23%的人准确地自我评估了Word的技能水平,而11%的人高估了技能水平。培训前后ppt评分平均差异为14.38%,差异有统计学意义(p < 0.001)。训练前和训练后单词综合得分的平均差异为10.46%,具有统计学意义(p < .001)。参与者对基础技术工具技能的关注表示赞赏。随后将进行一项长期、细致的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信