Ripple Correlation Control Maximum Power Point Tracking for Battery Operated PV Systems: A Comparative analysis

P. Sahu, A. Sharma, Rajiv Dey
{"title":"Ripple Correlation Control Maximum Power Point Tracking for Battery Operated PV Systems: A Comparative analysis","authors":"P. Sahu, A. Sharma, Rajiv Dey","doi":"10.1109/IEMTRONICS51293.2020.9216414","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper presents a comparative analysis of Ripple Correlation Control (RCC) with conventional Maximum Power Point Tracking (MPPT) methods such as Perturb & Observe (P&O) and Incremental Conductance (IC). Photovoltaic (PV) array along with the buck converter and its MPPT control have been simulated for all three MPPT methods at different solar radiation levels. From the simulation results, it can be observed that P&O is much affected with slow tracking and oscillations, and IC MPPT performs better than P&O in terms of tracking, but not for ripples. Simulation results verifies that RCC MPPT is capable of solving both these problems effectively and RCC performance is better than both P&O and IC MPPT methods.","PeriodicalId":269697,"journal":{"name":"2020 IEEE International IOT, Electronics and Mechatronics Conference (IEMTRONICS)","volume":"55 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2020 IEEE International IOT, Electronics and Mechatronics Conference (IEMTRONICS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IEMTRONICS51293.2020.9216414","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

This paper presents a comparative analysis of Ripple Correlation Control (RCC) with conventional Maximum Power Point Tracking (MPPT) methods such as Perturb & Observe (P&O) and Incremental Conductance (IC). Photovoltaic (PV) array along with the buck converter and its MPPT control have been simulated for all three MPPT methods at different solar radiation levels. From the simulation results, it can be observed that P&O is much affected with slow tracking and oscillations, and IC MPPT performs better than P&O in terms of tracking, but not for ripples. Simulation results verifies that RCC MPPT is capable of solving both these problems effectively and RCC performance is better than both P&O and IC MPPT methods.
电池供电光伏系统的纹波相关控制最大功率点跟踪:比较分析
本文将纹波相关控制(RCC)与传统的最大功率点跟踪(MPPT)方法,如摄动与观察(P&O)和增量电导(IC)进行了比较分析。在不同太阳辐射水平下,对光伏阵列、降压变换器及其MPPT控制进行了仿真研究。从仿真结果可以看出,缓慢跟踪和振荡对P&O的影响很大,IC MPPT在跟踪方面优于P&O,但在纹波方面优于P&O。仿真结果验证了RCC MPPT能够有效地解决这两个问题,并且RCC的性能优于P&O和IC MPPT方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信