Time-Varying Financial Performance of Green and Traditional Energy Indices with Special Reference to the Covid-19 Context

Pascal Alphonse, David Bourghelle, Fredj Jawadi, P. Rozin
{"title":"Time-Varying Financial Performance of Green and Traditional Energy Indices with Special Reference to the Covid-19 Context","authors":"Pascal Alphonse, David Bourghelle, Fredj Jawadi, P. Rozin","doi":"10.54695/bmi.166.6714","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper comparatively investigates the financial performance of traditional and green energy indices from 2010 up to the current context of Covid-19. In particular, we analyze whether the green finance index supplants the traditional class of energy indices and examine whether consideration of a green index could provide a useful hedging solution in the specific context of Covid-19, a situation marked by a significant health risk and high volatility in the energy sector. Accordingly, we estimate different performance ratios and present some interesting findings. In particular, we find evidence of volatility and time variation in the market beta, suggesting that, whether conventional or green, energy sector sensitivity in fact depends on the market state (bear versus bull). Further, financial performance appears to be time varying and regime-dependent. Indeed, the conventional energy sector outperforms in a bear market, while the green index shows stronger financial performance in a bull market. These results are of interest for both investors and portfolio managers, helping them to balance their investments and optimize their portfolios according to the state of the market or the price regime.","PeriodicalId":142010,"journal":{"name":"Bankers, Markets & Investors","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bankers, Markets & Investors","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54695/bmi.166.6714","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper comparatively investigates the financial performance of traditional and green energy indices from 2010 up to the current context of Covid-19. In particular, we analyze whether the green finance index supplants the traditional class of energy indices and examine whether consideration of a green index could provide a useful hedging solution in the specific context of Covid-19, a situation marked by a significant health risk and high volatility in the energy sector. Accordingly, we estimate different performance ratios and present some interesting findings. In particular, we find evidence of volatility and time variation in the market beta, suggesting that, whether conventional or green, energy sector sensitivity in fact depends on the market state (bear versus bull). Further, financial performance appears to be time varying and regime-dependent. Indeed, the conventional energy sector outperforms in a bear market, while the green index shows stronger financial performance in a bull market. These results are of interest for both investors and portfolio managers, helping them to balance their investments and optimize their portfolios according to the state of the market or the price regime.
绿色和传统能源指数的时变财务绩效——特别参考Covid-19背景
本文对比研究了2010年至新冠肺炎疫情背景下传统能源指数和绿色能源指数的财务表现。特别是,我们分析了绿色金融指数是否取代了传统的能源指数类别,并研究了在2019冠状病毒病的特定背景下,考虑绿色指数是否可以提供有用的对冲解决方案,这种情况以重大健康风险和能源行业的高波动性为特征。因此,我们估计了不同的性能比率,并提出了一些有趣的发现。特别是,我们发现市场贝塔的波动性和时间变化的证据,这表明,无论是传统的还是绿色的,能源部门的敏感性实际上取决于市场状态(熊市还是牛市)。此外,财务业绩似乎是时变的,并依赖于政权。事实上,传统能源板块在熊市中表现出色,而绿色指数在牛市中表现更为强劲。这些结果对投资者和投资组合经理都很有意义,可以帮助他们根据市场状况或价格机制来平衡投资并优化投资组合。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信