Comparing Airport and Air Carrier Networks of Korea, China, and Japan in the International Aviation Market

Yongha Park
{"title":"Comparing Airport and Air Carrier Networks of Korea, China, and Japan in the International Aviation Market","authors":"Yongha Park","doi":"10.16879/JKCA.2020.20.3.057","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this study is to figure out structural differences among aviation networks of Korea, China, and Japan through analyzing their major airports’ and air carriers’ networks in the international aviation market. This study employs three (degree, betweeness, closeness) centrality, network density, and assortativity measures in the network analysis, in order to evaluate international connectivity of airports and air carriers operating in the three countries. The main results are as follows. First, ICN (Incheon International Airport) is positioned as a top-tier airport among major airports in Asia, in terms of international connectivity evaluated by the three centrality measures. Also, we confirm that the connectivity of secondary hubs in China and East Asia markets has rapidly increased from 2015 to 2019, according to increasing routes connecting between those regions. Next, through comparing major airports’ networks of the three countries in East Asia, we find that in Korea the centrality gap between ICN and the rest of international airports is larger than gaps among major airports in the counterparts, mainly affected by their hub network structures. However, LCCs (Low Cost Carriers) in Korea have the smaller dependence on ICN than FSCs (Full Service Carriers) according to operating regional airports as their secondary hubs. From the results, we confirm that it is necessary to pursue improving the international connectivity of regional international airports through expanding LCCs’ air networks as a suitable strategy to improve the accessibility to international flights for local residents, as well as to alleviate the imbalance of the national airport system.","PeriodicalId":132041,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Korean Cartographic Association","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Korean Cartographic Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.16879/JKCA.2020.20.3.057","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to figure out structural differences among aviation networks of Korea, China, and Japan through analyzing their major airports’ and air carriers’ networks in the international aviation market. This study employs three (degree, betweeness, closeness) centrality, network density, and assortativity measures in the network analysis, in order to evaluate international connectivity of airports and air carriers operating in the three countries. The main results are as follows. First, ICN (Incheon International Airport) is positioned as a top-tier airport among major airports in Asia, in terms of international connectivity evaluated by the three centrality measures. Also, we confirm that the connectivity of secondary hubs in China and East Asia markets has rapidly increased from 2015 to 2019, according to increasing routes connecting between those regions. Next, through comparing major airports’ networks of the three countries in East Asia, we find that in Korea the centrality gap between ICN and the rest of international airports is larger than gaps among major airports in the counterparts, mainly affected by their hub network structures. However, LCCs (Low Cost Carriers) in Korea have the smaller dependence on ICN than FSCs (Full Service Carriers) according to operating regional airports as their secondary hubs. From the results, we confirm that it is necessary to pursue improving the international connectivity of regional international airports through expanding LCCs’ air networks as a suitable strategy to improve the accessibility to international flights for local residents, as well as to alleviate the imbalance of the national airport system.
比较韩国、中国、日本在国际航空市场上的机场和航空公司网络
本研究的目的是通过分析韩国、中国和日本在国际航空市场上的主要机场和航空公司的网络,找出其航空网络的结构差异。本研究在网络分析中采用了三个(度、间度、紧密度)中心性、网络密度和分类性指标,以评估在三个国家运营的机场和航空公司的国际连通性。主要结果如下:首先,仁川国际机场(ICN)被定位为亚洲主要机场中的顶级机场,就三个中心性指标评估的国际连通性而言。此外,我们确认,2015年至2019年,中国和东亚市场二级枢纽的连通性迅速提高,这是由于这些地区之间连接航线的增加。其次,通过比较东亚三国主要机场网络,我们发现韩国ICN与其他国际机场的中心性差距大于其他国家主要机场之间的差距,这主要受其枢纽网络结构的影响。但是,韩国的低成本航空公司(lcc)以地区机场为第二枢纽,对ICN的依赖程度比全服务航空公司(fsc)要低。结果表明,通过扩大低成本航空公司的航空网络,提高区域国际机场的国际连通性,是改善当地居民国际航班可达性和缓解国家机场系统不平衡的合适策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信