Recurrence rate in patients with stage IV breast cancer: a retrospective cohort study

Leanda Grobler, A. Orchard, S. D. Moodley, Ion Pypers, Razeeya Khan
{"title":"Recurrence rate in patients with stage IV breast cancer: a retrospective cohort study","authors":"Leanda Grobler, A. Orchard, S. D. Moodley, Ion Pypers, Razeeya Khan","doi":"10.1097/OP9.0000000000000045","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Introduction: Metastatic breast cancer (mBC) remains incurable, with a median overall survival (OS) of approximately 3 years and a 5-year survival rate of approximately 25%, irrespective of the economic classification of the country where treatment is received. Cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) inhibitors increase overall survival in both first and second-line settings in the treatment of hormone receptor–positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2–negative mBC. This retrospective cohort study investigated the progression-free survival in women with mBC receiving combination therapy with abemaciclib (CDK4/CDK6 inhibitor) and letrozole or fulvestrant as opposed to abemaciclib only. Methods: The study included all eligible women with stage IV breast cancer treated with abemaciclib at a private oncology facility in Johannesburg over the study period. Data were collected from medical records from April 1, 2019 to March 31, 2021. Analyses were conducted to assess the overall survival rate, progression-free survival probability, and safety of abemaciclib in women with stage IV breast cancer. Results: Thirty-two patients were eligible for inclusion in this study. The progression-free survival probability was 60% after a period of 17 months, irrespective of treatment options. After 17 months, the OS of women on a combination of abemaciclib and letrozole was 80%, on a combination of abemaciclib and fulvestrant was 80%, and on abemaciclib monotherapy was 70%. The most noted adverse effects were diarrhea (92.0%), neutropenia (92.0%), fatigue (48.0%), and hepatotoxicity (16.0%). Discussion: Abemaciclib with endocrine therapy or an aromatase inhibitor provided an improvement in the OS compared with abemaciclib monotherapy. These findings are representative of the use of abemaciclib in a local population and are similar to those of larger studies conducted internationally.","PeriodicalId":210051,"journal":{"name":"The European Journal of Oncology Pharmacy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The European Journal of Oncology Pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/OP9.0000000000000045","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Introduction: Metastatic breast cancer (mBC) remains incurable, with a median overall survival (OS) of approximately 3 years and a 5-year survival rate of approximately 25%, irrespective of the economic classification of the country where treatment is received. Cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) inhibitors increase overall survival in both first and second-line settings in the treatment of hormone receptor–positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2–negative mBC. This retrospective cohort study investigated the progression-free survival in women with mBC receiving combination therapy with abemaciclib (CDK4/CDK6 inhibitor) and letrozole or fulvestrant as opposed to abemaciclib only. Methods: The study included all eligible women with stage IV breast cancer treated with abemaciclib at a private oncology facility in Johannesburg over the study period. Data were collected from medical records from April 1, 2019 to March 31, 2021. Analyses were conducted to assess the overall survival rate, progression-free survival probability, and safety of abemaciclib in women with stage IV breast cancer. Results: Thirty-two patients were eligible for inclusion in this study. The progression-free survival probability was 60% after a period of 17 months, irrespective of treatment options. After 17 months, the OS of women on a combination of abemaciclib and letrozole was 80%, on a combination of abemaciclib and fulvestrant was 80%, and on abemaciclib monotherapy was 70%. The most noted adverse effects were diarrhea (92.0%), neutropenia (92.0%), fatigue (48.0%), and hepatotoxicity (16.0%). Discussion: Abemaciclib with endocrine therapy or an aromatase inhibitor provided an improvement in the OS compared with abemaciclib monotherapy. These findings are representative of the use of abemaciclib in a local population and are similar to those of larger studies conducted internationally.
四期乳腺癌患者的复发率:一项回顾性队列研究
摘要:转移性乳腺癌(mBC)仍然无法治愈,无论接受治疗的国家的经济分类如何,其中位总生存期(OS)约为3年,5年生存率约为25%。细胞周期蛋白依赖性激酶(CDK)抑制剂在激素受体阳性、人表皮生长因子受体2阴性的mBC的一线和二线治疗中均可提高总生存率。这项回顾性队列研究调查了接受abemaciclib (CDK4/CDK6抑制剂)和来曲唑或氟维司汀联合治疗的女性mBC患者的无进展生存期,而不是仅接受abemaciclib。方法:该研究纳入了在研究期间在约翰内斯堡一家私人肿瘤机构接受abemaciclib治疗的所有符合条件的IV期乳腺癌妇女。数据收集自2019年4月1日至2021年3月31日的医疗记录。分析评估了abemaciclib在IV期乳腺癌患者中的总生存率、无进展生存率和安全性。结果:32例患者符合纳入研究的条件。无论治疗方案如何,17个月后无进展生存率为60%。17个月后,阿贝马昔lib和来曲唑联合治疗的女性总生存率为80%,阿贝马昔lib和氟维司汀联合治疗的女性总生存率为80%,阿贝马昔lib单药治疗的女性总生存率为70%。最显著的不良反应是腹泻(92.0%)、中性粒细胞减少(92.0%)、疲劳(48.0%)和肝毒性(16.0%)。讨论:与Abemaciclib单药治疗相比,Abemaciclib联合内分泌治疗或芳香化酶抑制剂可改善OS。这些发现代表了abemaciclib在当地人群中的使用,与国际上进行的大型研究相似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信