Using Open-Source Automatic Speech Recognition Tools for the Annotation of Dutch Infant-Directed Speech

Anika van der Klis, Frans Adriaans, Mengru Han, R. Kager
{"title":"Using Open-Source Automatic Speech Recognition Tools for the Annotation of Dutch Infant-Directed Speech","authors":"Anika van der Klis, Frans Adriaans, Mengru Han, R. Kager","doi":"10.3390/mti7070068","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There is a large interest in the annotation of speech addressed to infants. Infant-directed speech (IDS) has acoustic properties that might pose a challenge to automatic speech recognition (ASR) tools developed for adult-directed speech (ADS). While ASR tools could potentially speed up the annotation process, their effectiveness on this speech register is currently unknown. In this study, we assessed to what extent open-source ASR tools can successfully transcribe IDS. We used speech data from 21 Dutch mothers reading picture books containing target words to their 18- and 24-month-old children (IDS) and the experimenter (ADS). In Experiment 1, we examined how the ASR tool Kaldi-NL performs at annotating target words in IDS vs. ADS. We found that Kaldi-NL only found 55.8% of target words in IDS, while it annotated 66.8% correctly in ADS. In Experiment 2, we aimed to assess the difficulties in annotating IDS more broadly by transcribing all IDS utterances manually and comparing the word error rates (WERs) of two different ASR systems: Kaldi-NL and WhisperX. We found that WhisperX performs significantly better than Kaldi-NL. While there is much room for improvement, the results show that automatic transcriptions provide a promising starting point for researchers who have to transcribe a large amount of speech directed at infants.","PeriodicalId":408374,"journal":{"name":"Multimodal Technol. Interact.","volume":"78 5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Multimodal Technol. Interact.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/mti7070068","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

There is a large interest in the annotation of speech addressed to infants. Infant-directed speech (IDS) has acoustic properties that might pose a challenge to automatic speech recognition (ASR) tools developed for adult-directed speech (ADS). While ASR tools could potentially speed up the annotation process, their effectiveness on this speech register is currently unknown. In this study, we assessed to what extent open-source ASR tools can successfully transcribe IDS. We used speech data from 21 Dutch mothers reading picture books containing target words to their 18- and 24-month-old children (IDS) and the experimenter (ADS). In Experiment 1, we examined how the ASR tool Kaldi-NL performs at annotating target words in IDS vs. ADS. We found that Kaldi-NL only found 55.8% of target words in IDS, while it annotated 66.8% correctly in ADS. In Experiment 2, we aimed to assess the difficulties in annotating IDS more broadly by transcribing all IDS utterances manually and comparing the word error rates (WERs) of two different ASR systems: Kaldi-NL and WhisperX. We found that WhisperX performs significantly better than Kaldi-NL. While there is much room for improvement, the results show that automatic transcriptions provide a promising starting point for researchers who have to transcribe a large amount of speech directed at infants.
使用开源自动语音识别工具对荷兰语婴儿指向语音进行标注
对婴儿讲话的注释有很大的兴趣。婴儿定向语音(IDS)具有声学特性,这可能对针对成人定向语音(ADS)开发的自动语音识别(ASR)工具构成挑战。虽然ASR工具可能会加快注释过程,但它们在语音寄存器上的有效性目前尚不清楚。在这项研究中,我们评估了开源ASR工具在多大程度上可以成功转录IDS。我们使用了21位荷兰母亲给她们18个月和24个月大的孩子(IDS)和实验者(ADS)朗读含有目标单词的绘本的语音数据。在实验1中,我们研究了Kaldi-NL在IDS和ADS中标注目标词的表现。我们发现Kaldi-NL在IDS中只发现了55.8%的目标词,而在ADS中标注的正确率为66.8%。在实验2中,我们旨在通过手动转录所有IDS话语并比较Kaldi-NL和WhisperX两种不同的ASR系统的单词错误率(WERs)来评估更广泛地标注IDS的困难。我们发现WhisperX的性能明显优于Kaldi-NL。虽然还有很大的改进空间,但结果表明,自动转录为那些必须转录大量针对婴儿的言语的研究人员提供了一个有希望的起点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信