{"title":"Dialogue Discontinued: Heidegger on a Few Pages of Plato’s Theaetetus","authors":"F. González","doi":"10.5840/EPOCHE200711218","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"; According to Heidegger's own testimony, his 1940 essay, \"Plato's Doctrine of Truth,\" is derived from a course he first delivered in 1931/32. Yet, while an interpretation of the Theaetetus is central to the argument in 1931/32, this dialogue is not so much as mentioned in the 1940 essay. The reason is that Heidegger's own careful and insightful reading of the Theaetetus simply does not support his thesis regarding Plato's \"doctrine of truth.\" But then the real interest of this reading is that it affords the opportunity for pursuing a genuine dialogue between Heidegger and Plato that was too abruptly discontinued.","PeriodicalId":202733,"journal":{"name":"Epoch","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Epoch","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5840/EPOCHE200711218","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Abstract
; According to Heidegger's own testimony, his 1940 essay, "Plato's Doctrine of Truth," is derived from a course he first delivered in 1931/32. Yet, while an interpretation of the Theaetetus is central to the argument in 1931/32, this dialogue is not so much as mentioned in the 1940 essay. The reason is that Heidegger's own careful and insightful reading of the Theaetetus simply does not support his thesis regarding Plato's "doctrine of truth." But then the real interest of this reading is that it affords the opportunity for pursuing a genuine dialogue between Heidegger and Plato that was too abruptly discontinued.
;根据海德格尔自己的证词,他在1940年发表的论文《柏拉图的真理学说》(Plato’s Doctrine of Truth)源自他在1931/32年首次讲授的课程。然而,尽管对《泰阿泰德篇》的解释是1931/32年争论的核心,但这段对话在1940年的文章中并没有被提及。原因是海德格尔自己对《泰阿德图》的仔细而深刻的阅读根本不支持他关于柏拉图的“真理学说”的论点。但是,这篇阅读的真正趣味在于,它提供了一个机会,去追求海德格尔和柏拉图之间的真正对话,那是突然中断的。