Two different design methods and simulations of axial-flow hydraulic turbine runner

Q. M. B. Soesanto
{"title":"Two different design methods and simulations of axial-flow hydraulic turbine runner","authors":"Q. M. B. Soesanto","doi":"10.1109/ICSEEA.2016.7873575","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper discusses the runner blade design of axial-flow hydraulic turbine type propeller using two different methods. The first method is considered with no-swirl flow at runner exit, while the second method with swirl flow at runner exit. The design results show that both methods produce the different stagger angle at each blade section of the runner blade. The numerical simulation was performed using computational fluid dynamics (CFD) approach to calculate the performance characteristic of the runner blade designs. Commercial software ANSYS CFX was used as CFD solver. From the operating simulation results in conditions, no-swirl flow assumption at runner exit achieved the greater power than the swirl flow assumption at runner exit. The maximum runner efficiency of swirl flow assumption at runner exit is higher than no-swirl flow assumption. However, it would be more beneficial for using the design condition that achieve the greater power in operating conditions. Thus, no-swirl flow at runner exit design assumption is recommended during the design phase of the runner blade of axial flow hydraulic turbine type propeller.","PeriodicalId":149415,"journal":{"name":"2016 International Conference on Sustainable Energy Engineering and Application (ICSEEA)","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 International Conference on Sustainable Energy Engineering and Application (ICSEEA)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSEEA.2016.7873575","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This paper discusses the runner blade design of axial-flow hydraulic turbine type propeller using two different methods. The first method is considered with no-swirl flow at runner exit, while the second method with swirl flow at runner exit. The design results show that both methods produce the different stagger angle at each blade section of the runner blade. The numerical simulation was performed using computational fluid dynamics (CFD) approach to calculate the performance characteristic of the runner blade designs. Commercial software ANSYS CFX was used as CFD solver. From the operating simulation results in conditions, no-swirl flow assumption at runner exit achieved the greater power than the swirl flow assumption at runner exit. The maximum runner efficiency of swirl flow assumption at runner exit is higher than no-swirl flow assumption. However, it would be more beneficial for using the design condition that achieve the greater power in operating conditions. Thus, no-swirl flow at runner exit design assumption is recommended during the design phase of the runner blade of axial flow hydraulic turbine type propeller.
轴流式水轮机转轮的两种不同设计方法及仿真
本文用两种不同的方法讨论了轴流式水轮机型螺旋桨转轮叶片的设计。第一种方法考虑流道出口无旋流,第二种方法考虑流道出口有旋流。设计结果表明,两种方法在流道叶片各叶段产生不同的交错角。采用计算流体力学(CFD)方法进行数值模拟,计算流道叶片设计的性能特征。采用商业软件ANSYS CFX作为CFD求解器。从工况下的运行仿真结果来看,流道出口无旋流假设比流道出口旋流假设获得的功率更大。流道出口有旋流假设的最大流道效率高于无旋流假设。但在运行工况下,采用达到更大功率的设计工况更为有利。因此,在轴流式水轮机式螺旋桨转轮叶片设计阶段,推荐采用转轮出口无旋流设计假设。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信