Monolingual vs codeswitching modes: Voice onset time in Lebanese Arabic and English

Niamh E. Kelly, Mia El Houry, Farah Ghamloush
{"title":"Monolingual vs codeswitching modes: Voice onset time in Lebanese Arabic and English","authors":"Niamh E. Kelly, Mia El Houry, Farah Ghamloush","doi":"10.1121/2.0001422","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The production of stops in Lebanese Arabic and English was examined in monolingual mode and codeswitching mode. Voice onset time (VOT) was measured in word-initial voiced and voiceless stops for nine bilingual speakers and 12 monolingual Arabic speakers. Mixed model linear regressions found no significant difference in VOT between conditions (monolingual versus codeswitching), between languages (Arabic versus English), or between speaker groups (bilingual versus monolingual). The only significant predictor of VOT was voicing of the stops. These results show voicing during the closure for voiced stops and some aspiration for voiceless stops, with the same patterns found for bilingual speakers (in both languages) and monolingual speakers.","PeriodicalId":394589,"journal":{"name":"179th Meeting of the Acoustical Society of America","volume":"39 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"179th Meeting of the Acoustical Society of America","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1121/2.0001422","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The production of stops in Lebanese Arabic and English was examined in monolingual mode and codeswitching mode. Voice onset time (VOT) was measured in word-initial voiced and voiceless stops for nine bilingual speakers and 12 monolingual Arabic speakers. Mixed model linear regressions found no significant difference in VOT between conditions (monolingual versus codeswitching), between languages (Arabic versus English), or between speaker groups (bilingual versus monolingual). The only significant predictor of VOT was voicing of the stops. These results show voicing during the closure for voiced stops and some aspiration for voiceless stops, with the same patterns found for bilingual speakers (in both languages) and monolingual speakers.
单语vs代码转换模式:黎巴嫩阿拉伯语和英语的语音开始时间
在单语模式和代码转换模式下,研究了黎巴嫩阿拉伯语和英语停顿的产生。对9名双语者和12名单语阿拉伯语者的发音起始时间(VOT)进行了测量。混合模型线性回归发现,不同条件(单语与编码转换)、不同语言(阿拉伯语与英语)或不同说话群体(双语与单语)之间的VOT没有显著差异。VOT的唯一显著预测因子是停止的声音。这些结果表明,在浊音顿音结束时发声,在不浊音顿音结束时出现一些吐气,双语者(两种语言)和单语者也有同样的模式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信