Effect of amine fluoride subgingival irrigation on periodontally diseased sites.

Clinical preventive dentistry Pub Date : 1991-09-01
L Shapira, S Kaplan, J Goultschin, I Gedalia
{"title":"Effect of amine fluoride subgingival irrigation on periodontally diseased sites.","authors":"L Shapira,&nbsp;S Kaplan,&nbsp;J Goultschin,&nbsp;I Gedalia","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Amine fluoride gel, a surfactant and bactericidal compound was tested for irrigation of periodontal sites in inflammatory periodontal disease. Eight volunteer-patients who had at least 4 sites with probing depths of 6 mm or more in two different quadrants participated in the study. The start of the study was preceded by supragingival scaling. At the selected sites clinical (PI, GI, BOP, probing attachment) and microbial examinations (percentage motile rods and spirochetes) were performed at baseline, 30, 60 and 9 days. Irrigation with AmF gel and saline was performed at experimental and control sites twice weekly during one month. The mean Plaque Index, bleeding on probing and percentage mobile rods and spirochetes, at baseline, were not significantly different between the experimental and control groups, where as the mean gingival index and probing attachment were significantly different. There were decreases in the Plaque and Gingival Indexes, bleeding on probing, percentage motile rods and spirochetes and gain in probing attachment in both experimental and control groups during the test period of 60 days. However, these improvements from baseline values to the periods of 30, 60 and 90 days between the treatment and control groups were not significant. Although mean improvements of the parameters examined were greater in the experimental group, this was probably due to higher baseline values in this group.</p>","PeriodicalId":75715,"journal":{"name":"Clinical preventive dentistry","volume":"13 5","pages":"31-4"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1991-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical preventive dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Amine fluoride gel, a surfactant and bactericidal compound was tested for irrigation of periodontal sites in inflammatory periodontal disease. Eight volunteer-patients who had at least 4 sites with probing depths of 6 mm or more in two different quadrants participated in the study. The start of the study was preceded by supragingival scaling. At the selected sites clinical (PI, GI, BOP, probing attachment) and microbial examinations (percentage motile rods and spirochetes) were performed at baseline, 30, 60 and 9 days. Irrigation with AmF gel and saline was performed at experimental and control sites twice weekly during one month. The mean Plaque Index, bleeding on probing and percentage mobile rods and spirochetes, at baseline, were not significantly different between the experimental and control groups, where as the mean gingival index and probing attachment were significantly different. There were decreases in the Plaque and Gingival Indexes, bleeding on probing, percentage motile rods and spirochetes and gain in probing attachment in both experimental and control groups during the test period of 60 days. However, these improvements from baseline values to the periods of 30, 60 and 90 days between the treatment and control groups were not significant. Although mean improvements of the parameters examined were greater in the experimental group, this was probably due to higher baseline values in this group.

氟胺龈下冲洗对牙周病变部位的影响。
氟化胺凝胶是一种表面活性剂和杀菌化合物,用于炎症性牙周病牙周部位的冲洗。在两个不同象限中至少有4个探查深度为6毫米或以上的部位的8名志愿者患者参加了这项研究。研究开始前进行了龈上刮治。在选定的部位,分别于基线、30、60和9天进行临床检查(PI、GI、BOP、探针附着)和微生物检查(活动杆和螺旋体百分比)。用AmF凝胶和生理盐水在实验和对照部位进行灌溉,每周两次,持续一个月。实验组和对照组在基线时的平均菌斑指数、探针上的出血以及活动杆和螺旋体的百分比无显著差异,而平均牙龈指数和探针附着有显著差异。试验期60 d,试验组和对照组的菌斑指数、牙龈指数、探诊出血、活动杆和螺旋体百分比、探诊附着体增加均明显减少。然而,治疗组和对照组之间从基线值到30,60和90天期间的这些改善并不显著。虽然实验组所检查参数的平均改善更大,但这可能是由于该组的基线值更高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信