On the Genealogy of the "Judicial Error" (1983)

W. Holdheim
{"title":"On the Genealogy of the \"Judicial Error\" (1983)","authors":"W. Holdheim","doi":"10.1080/1535685X.1995.11015769","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The inception of my study on judicial error was most atypical. Its very medium indicated a quest for my sources: I wanted to try my hand at writing my mother language for the first time since the age of twelve. I found that German runs much more smoothly under my pen than English, but this alone could not explain my pace. I am a slow and deliberate writer, but this text progressed in a downright somnambulistic way. It came right on the heels of a bulky, laboriously systematic investigation of Andre Gide's theory and practice of the novel, which had occupied me for six years. I embarked on a sabbatical term with a list of distracting and regenerative readings, to be preceded by a minor essay on some little matter that had struck my attention. When I looked up from my typewriter, the term was almost over, and my small essay turned out to be a monograph on the judicial error in certain representative modern narratives. I should have recognized my \"little matter\" as a genuine Ansatz one of those intuitive points of departure destined to be broadened and deepened into the exposition of a historical era or a comprehensive problem, as I knew them from the critical theory and practice of my teacher Erich Auerbach. If I failed to make the connection, it was because I still mistook the Auerbachian expansion of points of initiation for a prescriptive method; I did not yet realize that this procedure, for one who had just spent years to broaden his horizon, is less methodical than it is mimetic: it merely formalizes the way intellectual insight naturally comes about. My particular Ansatz was Dmitri's murder trial in The Brothers Karamazov. Critics had treated it as an outgrowth of Dostoevsky's journalistic activity, and as a satire of Alexander's judicial reform, but I had always felt that such marginal discussions did no justice to the true meaning and importance of the scene. Of course, I was predisposed to this recognition by a longstanding fascination with the rich repertory of detective and trial themes in literature, going back to The Eumenides and the","PeriodicalId":312913,"journal":{"name":"Cardozo Studies in Law and Literature","volume":"145 6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1995-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardozo Studies in Law and Literature","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1535685X.1995.11015769","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The inception of my study on judicial error was most atypical. Its very medium indicated a quest for my sources: I wanted to try my hand at writing my mother language for the first time since the age of twelve. I found that German runs much more smoothly under my pen than English, but this alone could not explain my pace. I am a slow and deliberate writer, but this text progressed in a downright somnambulistic way. It came right on the heels of a bulky, laboriously systematic investigation of Andre Gide's theory and practice of the novel, which had occupied me for six years. I embarked on a sabbatical term with a list of distracting and regenerative readings, to be preceded by a minor essay on some little matter that had struck my attention. When I looked up from my typewriter, the term was almost over, and my small essay turned out to be a monograph on the judicial error in certain representative modern narratives. I should have recognized my "little matter" as a genuine Ansatz one of those intuitive points of departure destined to be broadened and deepened into the exposition of a historical era or a comprehensive problem, as I knew them from the critical theory and practice of my teacher Erich Auerbach. If I failed to make the connection, it was because I still mistook the Auerbachian expansion of points of initiation for a prescriptive method; I did not yet realize that this procedure, for one who had just spent years to broaden his horizon, is less methodical than it is mimetic: it merely formalizes the way intellectual insight naturally comes about. My particular Ansatz was Dmitri's murder trial in The Brothers Karamazov. Critics had treated it as an outgrowth of Dostoevsky's journalistic activity, and as a satire of Alexander's judicial reform, but I had always felt that such marginal discussions did no justice to the true meaning and importance of the scene. Of course, I was predisposed to this recognition by a longstanding fascination with the rich repertory of detective and trial themes in literature, going back to The Eumenides and the
论“司法错误”的谱系(1983)
我对司法错误研究的开始是最不典型的。它的媒介本身表明了我对我的来源的追求:我想尝试写我的母语,这是12岁以来的第一次。我发现在我的笔下,德语比英语写得流畅得多,但单凭这一点并不能解释我的速度。我是一个缓慢而深思熟虑的作家,但这篇文章以一种彻头彻尾的梦游方式进行。我花了六年时间,对安德烈·纪德的小说理论和实践进行了大量、费力的系统研究。我带着一系列让人分心、让人恢复精力的读物开始了一个休假期,在这之前,我写了一篇关于某件引起我注意的小事的小文章。当我从打字机上抬起头来的时候,学期快结束了,我那篇小小的文章变成了一篇关于某些代表性现代叙事中司法错误的专著。我应该认识到我的“小问题”是一个真正的Ansatz——那些直觉的出发点之一,注定要被扩大和深化为对一个历史时代或一个全面问题的阐述,正如我从我的老师埃里希·奥尔巴赫的批判理论和实践中所知道的那样。如果我未能建立这种联系,那是因为我仍然把奥尔巴哈的起始点展开误认为是规定性方法;我当时还没有意识到,对于一个刚刚花了几年时间来拓宽视野的人来说,这个过程与其说是有条不紊,不如说是模仿:它只是形式化了智力洞察力自然产生的方式。我特别喜欢的安萨茨是《卡拉马佐夫兄弟》中德米特里谋杀案的审判。评论家们认为这是陀思妥耶夫斯基新闻活动的产物,是对亚历山大司法改革的讽刺,但我一直觉得,这种边缘性的讨论并没有公正地对待这一场景的真正意义和重要性。当然,我对文学中丰富的侦探和审判主题有着长期的迷恋,这可以追溯到《欧门尼德斯》和《
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信