Networking Hybridizations within the Semiosphere: a research trajectory for the Cultural Transposition of the Chinese Lesson Study within a Western context

F. Arzarello, Silvia Funghi, Carola Manolino, Alessandro Ramploud, M. G. Bartolini Bussi
{"title":"Networking Hybridizations within the Semiosphere: a research trajectory for the Cultural Transposition of the Chinese Lesson Study within a Western context","authors":"F. Arzarello, Silvia Funghi, Carola Manolino, Alessandro Ramploud, M. G. Bartolini Bussi","doi":"10.1108/ijlls-06-2022-0083","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThe aim of this paper is to describe teachers’ professional development in Lesson Study (LS) as processes situated in Semiosphere and generated by the unevenness due to different cultural traditions. The authors characterise teachers’ professional development in two LS experiments as processes generating new knowledge to point out their products, i.e. new professional frame teachers produce after these experiments. The authors use Hybridization, a particular form of Networking of Theories (NWT).Design/methodology/approachThe authors collected video-registration of several Italian LS meetings. The authors analyse two LSs, where time emerged as a conflictual aspect. Through Hybridization components, the authors show how teachers make sense of LS and how teachers revise their professional frame.Theoretical frameworkIn NWT different theories are deployed to study the same problem. To grasp the issue of unevenness in our LS, we use Hybridization of a Theory, a form of NWT characterised by a structural asymmetry. It is given when a construct c is introduced coherently, operatively and productively into a theory T, obtaining a hybridized theory T'.FindingsHybridization lens allows to describe potentialities and limits of LS as a tool for teachers’ development. The two analysed LS are different: in one of them Hybridization process produced a new theory T', whilst in the second one it was limited to the awareness of a gap between LS and initial teachers’ professional frame.Practical implicationsIdentifying links between different Hybridization components is a helpful tool for teacher educators/researchers to foster the shift from one another. For instance, through this tool, teacher educators could keep track of what happens in successive LS and mirror the dialogue between teachers, moving towards group-shared metareflections. This initiates the advancement of a new theory T', where asymmetries are interpreted.Originality/valueIn this approach teachers are protagonists of the construction of a new professional frame. LS is a tool for teachers’ professional development, allowing teachers to question their own educational intentionalities. Hybridization components provide a tool to analyse such a process.","PeriodicalId":408622,"journal":{"name":"International Journal for Lesson & Learning Studies","volume":"87 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal for Lesson & Learning Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ijlls-06-2022-0083","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

PurposeThe aim of this paper is to describe teachers’ professional development in Lesson Study (LS) as processes situated in Semiosphere and generated by the unevenness due to different cultural traditions. The authors characterise teachers’ professional development in two LS experiments as processes generating new knowledge to point out their products, i.e. new professional frame teachers produce after these experiments. The authors use Hybridization, a particular form of Networking of Theories (NWT).Design/methodology/approachThe authors collected video-registration of several Italian LS meetings. The authors analyse two LSs, where time emerged as a conflictual aspect. Through Hybridization components, the authors show how teachers make sense of LS and how teachers revise their professional frame.Theoretical frameworkIn NWT different theories are deployed to study the same problem. To grasp the issue of unevenness in our LS, we use Hybridization of a Theory, a form of NWT characterised by a structural asymmetry. It is given when a construct c is introduced coherently, operatively and productively into a theory T, obtaining a hybridized theory T'.FindingsHybridization lens allows to describe potentialities and limits of LS as a tool for teachers’ development. The two analysed LS are different: in one of them Hybridization process produced a new theory T', whilst in the second one it was limited to the awareness of a gap between LS and initial teachers’ professional frame.Practical implicationsIdentifying links between different Hybridization components is a helpful tool for teacher educators/researchers to foster the shift from one another. For instance, through this tool, teacher educators could keep track of what happens in successive LS and mirror the dialogue between teachers, moving towards group-shared metareflections. This initiates the advancement of a new theory T', where asymmetries are interpreted.Originality/valueIn this approach teachers are protagonists of the construction of a new professional frame. LS is a tool for teachers’ professional development, allowing teachers to question their own educational intentionalities. Hybridization components provide a tool to analyse such a process.
符号圈内的网络杂交:西方语境下汉语课堂研究的文化转位研究轨迹
本研究的目的是描述教师在课程研究中的专业发展是一个位于符号圈的过程,是由不同文化传统的不均匀性所产生的。在两个LS实验中,作者将教师的专业发展描述为产生新知识的过程,以指出他们的产品,即教师在这些实验后产生新的专业框架。作者使用杂交,理论网络(NWT)的一种特殊形式。设计/方法/方法作者收集了几次意大利LS会议的视频注册。作者分析了两个LSs,其中时间作为一个冲突的方面出现。通过杂交成分,作者展示了教师如何理解LS以及教师如何修改他们的专业框架。在西北西北地区,不同的理论被用来研究同一个问题。为了掌握我们的LS中的不均匀问题,我们使用理论的杂交,这是一种以结构不对称为特征的NWT形式。当一个构造c被连贯地、可操作地、有效地引入到一个理论T中,得到一个杂交理论T'时,给出了它。找到平衡视角可以描述LS作为教师发展工具的潜力和局限性。这两种分析的LS是不同的,其中一种是杂交过程产生了新的理论T’,而另一种则局限于意识到LS与初始教师专业框架之间的差距。实际意义识别不同杂交成分之间的联系是教师、教育者/研究人员促进彼此转变的有用工具。例如,通过这个工具,教师教育者可以跟踪在连续的LS中发生的事情,并反映教师之间的对话,走向群体共享的元反思。这引发了一种新的理论T'的发展,其中解释了不对称。在这种方法中,教师是构建新的专业框架的主角。LS是教师专业发展的工具,让教师能够质疑自己的教育意图。杂交成分提供了一种分析这一过程的工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信