Evaluating the benefits and interactions of route guidance and traffic control strategies using simulation

Hesham A Rakha, M. Van Aerde, E. Case, A. Ugge
{"title":"Evaluating the benefits and interactions of route guidance and traffic control strategies using simulation","authors":"Hesham A Rakha, M. Van Aerde, E. Case, A. Ugge","doi":"10.1109/VNIS.1989.98780","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In order to estimate the potential benefits of route guidance and to examine the interactions between this and other traffic management studies, a simulation was performed on a representative traffic network consisting of a freeway and a parallel arterial. Different freeway and arterial incident scenarios were examined and, for each scenario, the impact of having various percentages of drivers equipped with a route guidance system was investigated. The incremental benefits of route guidance are found to be greatest for the first 20% of drivers with in-vehicle units, but further benefits continue to be obtained when the market penetration increases up to 100%. These benefits are the largest for incident scenarios, and increase with the duration of the incident. It is speculated that for normal traffic conditions only a few drivers need to reroute themselves to maintain an equilibrium assignment. However, an incident causes a greater disturbance in the equilibrium and therefore requires a greater percentage of drivers to reroute themselves before the new equilibrium can be reached.<<ETX>>","PeriodicalId":366041,"journal":{"name":"Conference Record of papers presented at the First Vehicle Navigation and Information Systems Conference (VNIS '89)","volume":"32 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1989-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"23","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Conference Record of papers presented at the First Vehicle Navigation and Information Systems Conference (VNIS '89)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/VNIS.1989.98780","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 23

Abstract

In order to estimate the potential benefits of route guidance and to examine the interactions between this and other traffic management studies, a simulation was performed on a representative traffic network consisting of a freeway and a parallel arterial. Different freeway and arterial incident scenarios were examined and, for each scenario, the impact of having various percentages of drivers equipped with a route guidance system was investigated. The incremental benefits of route guidance are found to be greatest for the first 20% of drivers with in-vehicle units, but further benefits continue to be obtained when the market penetration increases up to 100%. These benefits are the largest for incident scenarios, and increase with the duration of the incident. It is speculated that for normal traffic conditions only a few drivers need to reroute themselves to maintain an equilibrium assignment. However, an incident causes a greater disturbance in the equilibrium and therefore requires a greater percentage of drivers to reroute themselves before the new equilibrium can be reached.<>
利用仿真方法评估路线引导和交通控制策略的效益和相互作用
为了评估路线引导的潜在效益,并检查其与其他交通管理研究之间的相互作用,在一个由高速公路和平行干道组成的代表性交通网络上进行了模拟。研究了不同的高速公路和主干道事故场景,并调查了不同比例的驾驶员配备路线引导系统的影响。研究发现,对于前20%拥有车载设备的驾驶员来说,路线引导的增量效益最大,但当市场渗透率增加到100%时,进一步的效益将继续获得。这些好处在事件场景中是最大的,并且随着事件的持续时间而增加。据推测,在正常的交通条件下,只有少数司机需要改变自己的路线以保持均衡分配。然而,事故会对平衡造成更大的干扰,因此需要更大比例的司机在达到新的平衡之前改变路线。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信