Impact of Gender, Change of Base of Support, and Visual Deprivation on Postural Balance Control in Young, Healthy Subjects

A. Ghram, S. Abidi, Amal Ben Abdessamie, K. Weiss, M. Dammak, S. Jribi, A. Yahia, S. Ghroubi, M. Elleuch, B. Knechtle
{"title":"Impact of Gender, Change of Base of Support, and Visual Deprivation on Postural Balance Control in Young, Healthy Subjects","authors":"A. Ghram, S. Abidi, Amal Ben Abdessamie, K. Weiss, M. Dammak, S. Jribi, A. Yahia, S. Ghroubi, M. Elleuch, B. Knechtle","doi":"10.5812/intjssh-126891","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Vision, vestibular sense, proprioception and muscle strength are required to maintain balance. However, gender could also play a crucial role in postural sway. Objectives: This study was used to examine (i) the impact of gender, surface type, and vision on postural sway; (ii) the effects of gender and vision on the limb symmetry of postural sway; and (iii) to understand the effects of gender, stance, surface type and vision on the alterations of dynamic postural sway alterations. Methods: This was a cross-sectional study in which young, healthy men (n = 15) and women (n = 12) underwent a balance control assessment using a force plate (SATEL, 40 Hz). Postural stances were evaluated in different conditions: opened eyes (EO) and closed eyes (EC), on different surface foam vs. firm, a dominant leg stance (DL) vs. a non-dominant leg stance (NDL), and a mediolateral stance (ML) vs. an anteroposterior stance (AP). The mediolateral sway (ML sway), anteroposterior sway (AP sway), and sway area were calculated from the centre of pressure displacements. Results: ML sway, AP sway and sway area increased when eyes were closed (P < 0.000). Foam surface perturbs balance control more than firm surface under EO and EC conditions for both genders, as observed in the AP sway curve (P < 0.000). A functional symmetry exists between the DL and NDL for all sway parameters: the ML sway, AP sway, and sway area (P = 0.720; P = 0.292; P = 0.954). The AP stance is more stable for the ML sway than the ML stance for both genders (P < 0.001). For the AP sway, the ML stance is more stable than the AP sway AP direction stance for both genders (P < 0.001). Women were significantly more stable than men in the ML stance when vision was absent (P < 0.01). Conclusions: Postural sway was altered more significantly on a foam surface than on a firm surface and symmetry between the DL and NDL was observed. Furthermore, we concluded that women have better dynamic balance control than men.","PeriodicalId":118920,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Sport Studies for Health","volume":"77 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Sport Studies for Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5812/intjssh-126891","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Vision, vestibular sense, proprioception and muscle strength are required to maintain balance. However, gender could also play a crucial role in postural sway. Objectives: This study was used to examine (i) the impact of gender, surface type, and vision on postural sway; (ii) the effects of gender and vision on the limb symmetry of postural sway; and (iii) to understand the effects of gender, stance, surface type and vision on the alterations of dynamic postural sway alterations. Methods: This was a cross-sectional study in which young, healthy men (n = 15) and women (n = 12) underwent a balance control assessment using a force plate (SATEL, 40 Hz). Postural stances were evaluated in different conditions: opened eyes (EO) and closed eyes (EC), on different surface foam vs. firm, a dominant leg stance (DL) vs. a non-dominant leg stance (NDL), and a mediolateral stance (ML) vs. an anteroposterior stance (AP). The mediolateral sway (ML sway), anteroposterior sway (AP sway), and sway area were calculated from the centre of pressure displacements. Results: ML sway, AP sway and sway area increased when eyes were closed (P < 0.000). Foam surface perturbs balance control more than firm surface under EO and EC conditions for both genders, as observed in the AP sway curve (P < 0.000). A functional symmetry exists between the DL and NDL for all sway parameters: the ML sway, AP sway, and sway area (P = 0.720; P = 0.292; P = 0.954). The AP stance is more stable for the ML sway than the ML stance for both genders (P < 0.001). For the AP sway, the ML stance is more stable than the AP sway AP direction stance for both genders (P < 0.001). Women were significantly more stable than men in the ML stance when vision was absent (P < 0.01). Conclusions: Postural sway was altered more significantly on a foam surface than on a firm surface and symmetry between the DL and NDL was observed. Furthermore, we concluded that women have better dynamic balance control than men.
性别、支撑基础改变和视觉剥夺对年轻健康受试者体位平衡控制的影响
背景:视力、前庭感觉、本体感觉和肌肉力量是维持平衡的必要条件。然而,性别也可能在姿势摇摆中发挥关键作用。目的:本研究旨在检验(i)性别、体表类型和视力对体位摇摆的影响;(ii)性别和视力对姿势摇摆肢体对称性的影响;(3)了解性别、体位、体表类型和视觉对动态体位摇摆变化的影响。方法:这是一项横断面研究,年轻健康男性(n = 15)和女性(n = 12)使用力板(SATEL, 40 Hz)进行平衡控制评估。在不同的条件下评估体位:睁眼(EO)和闭眼(EC),在不同的表面泡沫与坚固,优势腿位(DL)与非优势腿位(NDL),中外侧立场(ML)与前后立场(AP)。从压力位移中心计算中外侧偏移(ML偏移)、前后偏移(AP偏移)和偏移面积。结果:闭眼时,ML、AP、摆动面积均增加(P < 0.000)。从AP摇摆曲线(P < 0.000)可以看出,在EO和EC条件下,泡沫表面比坚固表面对平衡控制的干扰更大。DL和NDL在所有摇摆参数之间存在函数对称:ML摇摆,AP摇摆和摇摆面积(P = 0.720;P = 0.292;P = 0.954)。男性和女性的左位比右位更稳定(P < 0.001)。对于左旋姿势,男女左旋姿势比左旋姿势更稳定(P < 0.001)。无视力时,女性在ML站位的稳定性显著高于男性(P < 0.01)。结论:在泡沫表面上体位摇摆比在坚硬表面上更明显,并且DL和NDL之间存在对称性。此外,我们得出结论,女性比男性有更好的动态平衡控制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信