Learning When to Treat Business Processes: Prescriptive Process Monitoring with Causal Inference and Reinforcement Learning

Z. Bozorgi, M. Dumas, M. Rosa, Artem Polyvyanyy, M. Shoush, Irene Teinemaa
{"title":"Learning When to Treat Business Processes: Prescriptive Process Monitoring with Causal Inference and Reinforcement Learning","authors":"Z. Bozorgi, M. Dumas, M. Rosa, Artem Polyvyanyy, M. Shoush, Irene Teinemaa","doi":"10.48550/arXiv.2303.03572","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Increasing the success rate of a process, i.e. the percentage of cases that end in a positive outcome, is a recurrent process improvement goal. At runtime, there are often certain actions (a.k.a. treatments) that workers may execute to lift the probability that a case ends in a positive outcome. For example, in a loan origination process, a possible treatment is to issue multiple loan offers to increase the probability that the customer takes a loan. Each treatment has a cost. Thus, when defining policies for prescribing treatments to cases, managers need to consider the net gain of the treatments. Also, the effect of a treatment varies over time: treating a case earlier may be more effective than later in a case. This paper presents a prescriptive monitoring method that automates this decision-making task. The method combines causal inference and reinforcement learning to learn treatment policies that maximize the net gain. The method leverages a conformal prediction technique to speed up the convergence of the reinforcement learning mechanism by separating cases that are likely to end up in a positive or negative outcome, from uncertain cases. An evaluation on two real-life datasets shows that the proposed method outperforms a state-of-the-art baseline.","PeriodicalId":321309,"journal":{"name":"International Conference on Advanced Information Systems Engineering","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Conference on Advanced Information Systems Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2303.03572","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Increasing the success rate of a process, i.e. the percentage of cases that end in a positive outcome, is a recurrent process improvement goal. At runtime, there are often certain actions (a.k.a. treatments) that workers may execute to lift the probability that a case ends in a positive outcome. For example, in a loan origination process, a possible treatment is to issue multiple loan offers to increase the probability that the customer takes a loan. Each treatment has a cost. Thus, when defining policies for prescribing treatments to cases, managers need to consider the net gain of the treatments. Also, the effect of a treatment varies over time: treating a case earlier may be more effective than later in a case. This paper presents a prescriptive monitoring method that automates this decision-making task. The method combines causal inference and reinforcement learning to learn treatment policies that maximize the net gain. The method leverages a conformal prediction technique to speed up the convergence of the reinforcement learning mechanism by separating cases that are likely to end up in a positive or negative outcome, from uncertain cases. An evaluation on two real-life datasets shows that the proposed method outperforms a state-of-the-art baseline.
学习何时处理业务流程:基于因果推理和强化学习的规定性流程监控
提高过程的成功率,即以积极结果结束的案例的百分比,是一个反复出现的过程改进目标。在运行时,工作人员通常会执行某些操作(也称为处理),以提高案例以积极结果结束的概率。例如,在贷款发起流程中,一种可能的处理方法是发出多个贷款要约,以增加客户获得贷款的可能性。每一种治疗都有成本。因此,在制定针对病例的处方治疗政策时,管理人员需要考虑治疗的净收益。此外,治疗的效果会随着时间的推移而变化:对一个病例的早期治疗可能比晚期治疗更有效。本文提出了一种使决策任务自动化的规定性监测方法。该方法结合因果推理和强化学习来学习净收益最大化的治疗策略。该方法利用保形预测技术,通过将可能以积极或消极结果结束的情况与不确定情况分开,来加速强化学习机制的收敛。对两个真实数据集的评估表明,所提出的方法优于最先进的基线。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信