At the Tipping Point: Race and Gender Discrimination in a Common Economic Transaction

Lu-in Wang
{"title":"At the Tipping Point: Race and Gender Discrimination in a Common Economic Transaction","authors":"Lu-in Wang","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2224143","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This Article examines the ubiquitous, multibillion dollar practice of tipping as a vehicle for race and gender discrimination by both customers and servers and as a case study of the role that organizations play in producing and promoting unequal treatment. The unique structure of tipped service encounters provides plenty of opportunities and incentives for the two parties to discriminate against one another. Neither customers nor servers are likely to find legal redress for the kinds of discrimination that are most likely to occur in tipped service transactions, however, because many of the same features of the transaction that promote discrimination also stand in the way of legal accountability for the discrimination that results. Moreover, while tipped service transactions directly involve just the customer and server, they take place within an organizational framework that is created by a third party in their relationship, the firm that sells to the customer and employs the server. That framework often facilitates discriminatory bias in the decisions of customers and servers and encourages the firm to make decisions that reinforce the discriminatory dynamics of the service encounter. Yet, the “triangular” structure of the relationship among firm, customer, and server both obscures the firm’s role in producing discriminatory outcomes and protects the firm against liability to either of the other parties. Close examination of discrimination in tipped service encounters reveals the importance of an understanding of discrimination that lessens the focus on individual decision making and supports recent calls for a newer, structural approach to antidiscrimination law.","PeriodicalId":134519,"journal":{"name":"LSN: Discrimination Law (Topic)","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"15","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"LSN: Discrimination Law (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2224143","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

Abstract

This Article examines the ubiquitous, multibillion dollar practice of tipping as a vehicle for race and gender discrimination by both customers and servers and as a case study of the role that organizations play in producing and promoting unequal treatment. The unique structure of tipped service encounters provides plenty of opportunities and incentives for the two parties to discriminate against one another. Neither customers nor servers are likely to find legal redress for the kinds of discrimination that are most likely to occur in tipped service transactions, however, because many of the same features of the transaction that promote discrimination also stand in the way of legal accountability for the discrimination that results. Moreover, while tipped service transactions directly involve just the customer and server, they take place within an organizational framework that is created by a third party in their relationship, the firm that sells to the customer and employs the server. That framework often facilitates discriminatory bias in the decisions of customers and servers and encourages the firm to make decisions that reinforce the discriminatory dynamics of the service encounter. Yet, the “triangular” structure of the relationship among firm, customer, and server both obscures the firm’s role in producing discriminatory outcomes and protects the firm against liability to either of the other parties. Close examination of discrimination in tipped service encounters reveals the importance of an understanding of discrimination that lessens the focus on individual decision making and supports recent calls for a newer, structural approach to antidiscrimination law.
在引爆点:共同经济交易中的种族和性别歧视
这篇文章调查了无处不在的、数十亿美元的小费行为,作为顾客和服务员种族和性别歧视的工具,并作为组织在制造和促进不平等待遇方面所起作用的案例研究。小费服务的独特结构为双方相互歧视提供了大量的机会和动机。顾客和服务员都不太可能为小费服务交易中最可能发生的各种歧视找到法律补救,然而,因为促进歧视的交易的许多相同特征也阻碍了对由此产生的歧视的法律责任。此外,虽然小费服务交易直接涉及客户和服务器,但它们发生在一个组织框架内,这个组织框架是由他们关系中的第三方创建的,即向客户销售并雇用服务器的公司。这一框架往往助长了顾客和服务员决策中的歧视性偏见,并鼓励公司做出强化服务遭遇中歧视性动态的决策。然而,企业、顾客和服务之间的“三角”关系结构既模糊了企业在产生歧视性结果方面的作用,又保护了企业免于对其他任何一方承担责任。仔细研究小费服务中的歧视,揭示了理解歧视的重要性,它减少了对个人决策的关注,并支持了最近对反歧视法的更新,结构性方法的呼吁。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信