The Effectiveness of Soil and Water Conservation as Climate Smart Agricultural Practice and Its Contribution to Smallholder Farmers’ Livelihoods. The Case of Bambasi District Benishangul Gumuz Regional State, Northwest of Ethiopia

Dereje Mosissa
{"title":"The Effectiveness of Soil and Water Conservation as Climate Smart Agricultural Practice and Its Contribution to Smallholder Farmers’ Livelihoods. The Case of Bambasi District Benishangul Gumuz Regional State, Northwest of Ethiopia","authors":"Dereje Mosissa","doi":"10.33552/wjass.2019.02.000542","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study is an investigation of effectiveness of soil and water conservation practices as climate smart agriculture and its’ contribution to the livelihoods of smallholders farmers in  Bambasi District of Northwestern Ethiopia. It was hypothesized that there is no relationship between factors contributing to the adoption of SWC technologies and a number of SWC technologies adopted, as well as there is no relationship between the number of SWC technologies used by farmers and access to the livelihood assets. In order to address the objectives, both primary and secondary data were used for the study. The study applied a non-experimental design (explanatory) to collect primary data from a sample of 270 households drawn from the three Kebeles. Stratified random sampling technique was also used along with the simple random sampling technique in each stratum. The data collected was then analyzed by inferential statistics such as chi-square by using STATA 14.2 and Microsoft office Excel. Perceptions The study found out that most adopted SWC technologies are crop rotation, level bund, agricultural inputs and FanyaJuu terraces, of which few of them were considered as effective while the main factors influencing their adoption are farm size, having livestock, crop yield, farmers’ perception of the soil erosion problem, access to extension services and experience, availability of inputs support and steep slope. It was found that 9.3% of respondents adopt at least one technique while 37.8% use the four identified SWC technologies. The results revealed that respondents have access to livelihood assets (natural, human, social, physical and financial assets) found in the area of study. The statistical test showed that farm size, crop yield, perception of soil erosion, availability of inputs supports, the availability of training and access on it as well as farmers’ experience, Natural and social assets and steep slope have a connection with adoption of SWC technologies, while the others not. The study concluded that most of the participants were willing to maintain soil as a valuable resource and apply SWC technologies for maximizing their benefits, but expressed the need for the continuing support of the implementation. Further, it also brings to a close that conservation efforts ought to focus on areas where expected benefits are higher, especially on the steeper slopes, in order to encourage the use of the SWC technologies. Keywords : Adaptation, livelihood assets, Agricultural technology, small holders, soil erosion DOI : 10.7176/JBAH/9-12-01 Publication date :June 30 th 2019","PeriodicalId":194042,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Agriculture and Soil Science","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Agriculture and Soil Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33552/wjass.2019.02.000542","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

This study is an investigation of effectiveness of soil and water conservation practices as climate smart agriculture and its’ contribution to the livelihoods of smallholders farmers in  Bambasi District of Northwestern Ethiopia. It was hypothesized that there is no relationship between factors contributing to the adoption of SWC technologies and a number of SWC technologies adopted, as well as there is no relationship between the number of SWC technologies used by farmers and access to the livelihood assets. In order to address the objectives, both primary and secondary data were used for the study. The study applied a non-experimental design (explanatory) to collect primary data from a sample of 270 households drawn from the three Kebeles. Stratified random sampling technique was also used along with the simple random sampling technique in each stratum. The data collected was then analyzed by inferential statistics such as chi-square by using STATA 14.2 and Microsoft office Excel. Perceptions The study found out that most adopted SWC technologies are crop rotation, level bund, agricultural inputs and FanyaJuu terraces, of which few of them were considered as effective while the main factors influencing their adoption are farm size, having livestock, crop yield, farmers’ perception of the soil erosion problem, access to extension services and experience, availability of inputs support and steep slope. It was found that 9.3% of respondents adopt at least one technique while 37.8% use the four identified SWC technologies. The results revealed that respondents have access to livelihood assets (natural, human, social, physical and financial assets) found in the area of study. The statistical test showed that farm size, crop yield, perception of soil erosion, availability of inputs supports, the availability of training and access on it as well as farmers’ experience, Natural and social assets and steep slope have a connection with adoption of SWC technologies, while the others not. The study concluded that most of the participants were willing to maintain soil as a valuable resource and apply SWC technologies for maximizing their benefits, but expressed the need for the continuing support of the implementation. Further, it also brings to a close that conservation efforts ought to focus on areas where expected benefits are higher, especially on the steeper slopes, in order to encourage the use of the SWC technologies. Keywords : Adaptation, livelihood assets, Agricultural technology, small holders, soil erosion DOI : 10.7176/JBAH/9-12-01 Publication date :June 30 th 2019
水土保持作为气候智慧型农业实践的有效性及其对小农生计的贡献。埃塞俄比亚西北部班巴斯县本尚古古尔-古穆兹州的案例
本研究调查了水土保持实践作为气候智能型农业的有效性及其对埃塞俄比亚西北部班巴斯地区小农生计的贡献。假设促成SWC技术采用的因素与采用的SWC技术数量之间没有关系,以及农民使用的SWC技术数量与获得生计资产之间没有关系。为了解决的目标,这两个主要和次要的数据被用于研究。该研究采用非实验设计(解释性)从三个Kebeles抽取的270个家庭样本中收集原始数据。在分层随机抽样的基础上,对各层进行简单随机抽样。使用STATA 14.2软件和Microsoft office Excel软件对收集的数据进行卡方等推理统计分析。研究发现,采用最多的SWC技术是轮作、水平堤、农业投入品和FanyaJuu梯田,其中很少被认为是有效的,而影响其采用的主要因素是农场规模、饲养牲畜、作物产量、农民对土壤侵蚀问题的认识、获得推广服务和经验、投入品支持的可用性和坡度。调查发现,9.3%的受访者至少采用一种技术,而37.8%的受访者使用四种确定的SWC技术。调查结果显示,受访者可以获得研究区域内的生计资产(自然、人力、社会、物质和金融资产)。统计检验表明,农场规模、作物产量、对土壤侵蚀的认知、投入支持的可用性、培训的可用性和获取途径以及农民的经验、自然和社会资产以及陡坡与采用SWC技术有关,而其他因素与采用SWC技术无关。该研究的结论是,大多数参与者都愿意将土壤作为一种有价值的资源,并应用SWC技术以最大化其效益,但表示需要继续支持实施。此外,它还表明,为了鼓励使用SWC技术,保护工作应该集中在预期收益更高的地区,特别是在更陡峭的斜坡上。关键词:适应,生计资产,农业技术,小农,土壤侵蚀DOI: 10.7176/JBAH/9-12-01出版日期:2019年6月30日
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信